Listen to this Post
Introduction:
In cybersecurity, “being nice” often translates to granting excessive permissions, delaying patching to avoid disrupting users, and avoiding hard conversations about security gaps. Just as high performers sabotage their careers by constant accommodation, security professionals who prioritize comfort over clarity create gaping vulnerabilities—where unclear boundaries become attack surfaces and unassertive reporting lets threats escalate unnoticed.
Learning Objectives:
- Identify eight self-sabotaging behaviours in IT/security roles that mirror career accommodation traps.
- Implement boundary-setting through access control audits, privilege management, and automated alerting.
- Apply Linux/Windows commands to enforce visibility, document contributions, and harden configurations without compromising operational kindness.
You Should Know:
- Over-Accommodation in Access Control: The “Everyone Full Control” Trap
Being too accommodating in IAM (Identity and Access Management) means granting write access to read‑only users, leaving default passwords, or opening inbound ports “just for testing.” Attackers love nice admins.
Step‑by‑step guide to audit and enforce least privilege:
Linux:
List all users with sudo privileges (too many? that's over-accommodation) grep -E '^sudo|^wheel' /etc/group Find world-writable files (anyone can edit = security nightmare) find / -type f -perm -0002 -ls 2>/dev/null | grep -v "/proc|/sys" Audit file ACLs for excessive grants getfacl /etc/shadow should be root-only; if others can read, fix with: sudo setfacl -b /etc/shadow sudo chmod 640 /etc/shadow
Windows (PowerShell as Admin):
List all users with local admin rights (over-accommodation alert) net localgroup administrators Find NTFS directories with “Everyone” or “Domain Users” write access icacls C:\SensitiveData /find /inheritance:r | findstr "Everyone: (W) (F)" Remove excessive permissions (be assertive, not nice) icacls C:\SensitiveData /remove "Everyone" /t
What this does: Replaces “nice” open access with enforceable boundaries. Run weekly as a self‑audit. Document changes in a change log—visibility of your work is self‑advocacy.
2. Avoiding Hard Conversations: The Vulnerability Disclosure Dilemma
Nice security teams delay reporting critical findings to avoid “rocking the boat.” Meanwhile, unpatched Log4j or EternalBlue equivalents fester. Assertive disclosure saves careers and companies.
Step‑by‑step vulnerability handling with commands:
Step 1 – Discover (don’t soften the message):
Nmap aggressive service detection (no polite scanning if breach risk is high) nmap -sV --version-intensity 9 -p- 192.168.1.0/24 -oA network_audit
Step 2 – Document with timestamps and severity (no hiding details):
Extract high-severity CVEs from OpenVAS/Greenbone report
grep -i "critical|high" /var/log/openvas/report.html | awk -F '>' '{print $2}' | cut -d '<' -f1
Log assertion: append your findings with your name (claim your work)
echo "$(date) - [bash] - Critical: Unpatched SMBv1 on 10.0.0.45" >> /var/log/assertive_security.log
Step 3 – Report with evidence (no softening the language):
Windows: export event logs of failed logins (proof of active exploitation)
Get-WinEvent -FilterHashtable @{LogName='Security'; ID=4625} | Export-Csv -Path "evidence_bruteforce.csv"
Send assertive email using PowerShell (replace SMTP)
Send-MailMessage -To "[email protected]" -Subject "URGENT: 347 Failed Logins - Patching Required NOW" -Body (Get-Content evidence_bruteforce.csv -Raw) -SmtpServer internal-smtp
Pro tip: Use `–script vuln` in Nmap to auto‑classify. Never delete the raw output—it’s your contribution record.
- Undervaluing Your Work: Silent Logging vs. Proactive Metrics
Waiting to be noticed = no SIEM alerts, no dashboards, no dashboards. Self‑advocacy means making your work visible through instrumentation.
Step‑by‑step: Turn quiet logs into assertive metrics
Linux (auditd – assert your monitoring value):
Install and start auditd (track who accesses your configs) sudo apt install auditd -y sudo auditctl -w /etc/nginx/nginx.conf -p wa -k nginx_changes Generate a report of all changes (your impact) sudo ausearch -k nginx_changes --format csv | tee nginx_audit_report.csv Count how many changes you prevented (value metric) sudo ausearch -k nginx_changes --format csv | grep "denied" | wc -l
Windows (PowerShell monitoring → dashboard):
Create a real-time alert for privilege escalations (stop being invisible) $action = New-ScheduledTaskAction -Execute "PowerShell.exe" -Argument "-Command <code>"Send-MailMessage -To '[email protected]' -Subject 'ALERT: Admin added' -Body 'Check security log' -SmtpServer smtp</code>"" Register-ScheduledTask -Action $action -Trigger (New-ScheduledTaskTrigger -Once -At (Get-Date)) -TaskName "AdminAlert" -Force Export all firewall rule changes (your contribution proof) Get-1etFirewallRule | Where-Object {$<em>.Direction -eq 'Inbound' -and $</em>.Action -eq 'Allow'} | Export-Csv firewall_rules_$(Get-Date -Format yyyyMMdd).csv
Publish these reports weekly. Being nice = assuming someone reads logs. Being assertive = sending them the metrics first.
- Not Asking for What You Want: Privilege Escalation Requests vs. Silent Suffering
High performers wait to be given admin rights. Attackers just escalate. Don’t be nicer than a hacker.
Step‑by‑step: Audit current privileges, then formally request missing ones
Linux (check your current boundaries):
What CAN'T you do today? (be specific) sudo -l List allowed commands; if empty, you're over‑accommodating groups If not in 'docker' or 'admin', document missing access Generate request evidence – show why you need privileges systemctl status fail2ban 2>&1 | grep "Permission denied" > privilege_gap.log
Windows (assertive privilege inventory):
whoami /priv Show current privileges - missing SeBackupPrivilege? That's a gap. net user %USERNAME% /domain | findstr "Local Group Memberships"
How to request (template for Jira/Servicenow):
Request SeBackupPrivilege for backup automation – prevents 4h manual work daily Impact without: Backup failures documented 3x last week (see attached logs) Proposed boundary: Grant only to backup service account, log all uses via auditd ROI: Saves 20 team hours/week – attached metrics from `audit.log`
Stop assuming hard work speaks. Speak the hard work.
- Softening Every Message: Turning Critical Alerts Into Polite Suggestions
Nice alerts use “might,” “consider,” “recommend.” Breaches laugh at politeness.
Step‑by‑step: Rewrite your SIEM and logging to be assertive
Linux (syslog-1g assertive filter):
Before (nice): filter f_messages { level(warning); };
After (assertive): escalate critical immediately
filter f_critical { level(crit) or match("root login failed" value("MESSAGE")); };
destination d_assertive_email { email("[email protected]" template("URGENT: $MSG")); };
log { source(s_sys); filter(f_critical); destination(d_assertive_email); };
Windows (Event Viewer subscription for immediate action):
Create a custom view that excludes all "informational" (stop being nice)
wevtutil el | ForEach-Object { wevtutil gli $_ } | Where-Object {$<em>.IsEnabled -eq $true -and $</em>.LogType -1e "Info"} | Export-Csv urgent_events.csv
Send nightly assertive summary (no polite subject lines)
$subject = "CRITICAL: $(Get-Date -Format yyyy-MM-dd) – $( (Get-EventLog -LogName Security -EntryType Error).Count ) security errors"
Send-MailMessage -Subject $subject -Body (Get-Content urgent_events.csv -Raw) -From "[email protected]" -To "[email protected]" -SmtpServer mailhub
Pro tip: Use `–critical` flag in Nagios or `severity=alert` in Prometheus. If you wouldn’t page someone at 3 AM, it’s too soft.
- Putting Everyone Else First: Resource Starvation in Cloud Hardening
Nice architects give every team maximum CPU and unrestricted outbound traffic. Then one crypto‑miner ruins everyone’s day.
Step‑by‑step: Assertive resource boundaries (AWS/Linux example)
Linux cgroups (stop being the nice neighbor):
Create a control group for a noisy container (limit to 0.5 CPU)
sudo cgcreate -g cpu:/assertive_boundary
sudo cgset -r cpu.cfs_quota_us=50000 -r cpu.cfs_period_us=100000 assertive_boundary
sudo cgclassify -g cpu:/assertive_boundary $(pidof noisy_app)
Monitor over‑accommodation (who's stealing resources?)
top -b -1 1 | awk '$9 > 80 {print "Excessive CPU: " $12 " - " $9 "%"}' >> resource_hogs.log
Cloud (AWS CLI assertive policy):
Deny all outbound traffic except to approved IPs (stop being nice)
aws ec2 authorize-security-group-egress --group-id sg-123456 --ip-permissions IpProtocol=tcp,FromPort=443,ToPort=443,IpRanges='[{CidrIp=0.0.0.0/0,Description="Default allow"}]' NICE – DON'T DO THIS
Instead, assertive boundary:
aws ec2 revoke-security-group-egress --group-id sg-123456 --protocol all --port all --cidr 0.0.0.0/0
aws ec2 authorize-security-group-egress --group-id sg-123456 --ip-permissions IpProtocol=tcp,FromPort=443,ToPort=443,IpRanges='[{CidrIp="52.94.216.0/24"}]' only AWS services
Windows Resource Monitor (assertive reporting):
Find all processes hogging memory (stop letting others drain your VM)
Get-Process | Sort-Object -Property WS -Descending | Select-Object -First 10 | Where-Object {$_.WS -gt 500MB} | Format-Table ProcessName, WS -AutoSize | Out-File -Append memory_bullies.txt
Enforce quota via PowerShell (limit IIS app pool memory)
Import-Module WebAdministration
Set-ItemProperty -Path "IIS:\AppPools\OverAccommodatingApp" -1ame recycling.periodicRestart.memory -Value 512000
Kindness without quotas leads to denial‑of‑service by accident. Clear limits = uptime for all.
- Giving Away Credit: Attribution in Security Logs and IR Reports
Nice analysts share findings without watermarks. Then someone else presents them as their own. Assertive logging stamps your name in every artefact.
Step‑by‑step: Forensic attribution that can’t be erased
Linux (auditd with user tagging):
Append your username to every log entry export AUDIT_USER="YourName_ID123" echo "user=$AUDIT_USER" >> /etc/audit/rules.d/40-identity.rules sudo augenrules --load Every ausearch output now includes your mark – grep for it when sharing sudo ausearch -k critical_change --format csv | sed "s/$/,Analyst=$AUDIT_USER/"
Windows (PowerShell transcript with digital signature):
Start transcript that forces your signature
Start-Transcript -Path "C:\IR\$(Get-Date -Format yyyyMMdd)_YourName_incident.log" -Append -IncludeInvocationHeader
Run your analysis, then add GPG signature (assertive credit)
Get-ChildItem -Path C:\IR\ -Filter .log | ForEach-Object {
$content = Get-Content $<em>.FullName -Raw
$signature = "`n[Report generated by: $env:USERNAME on $(Get-Date)]"
Add-Content -Path $</em>.FullName -Value $signature
}
Hash the file – any alteration without your key breaks integrity
Get-FileHash C:\IR.log -Algorithm SHA256 | Export-Csv hashed_evidence.csv
Stop-Transcript
Share only the hashed version. If someone clones your work, the hash mismatch proves authorship. That’s not arrogance—it’s cryptographic self‑advocacy.
- Waiting to Be Noticed: Proactive Threat Hunting as Career Visibility
Nice teams wait for alerts. Aggressive hunters run `grep -r` across every log and publish findings daily. The difference between “we found a breach” (hero) and “we were breached” (scapegoat).
Step‑by‑step: Daily threat hunting that also hunts recognition
Linux (hunt for anomalies AND report them):
Hunt for reverse shells (don't wait for IPS alert) grep -R -E "bash -i >& /dev/tcp/|nc -e /bin/sh" /var/log/ 2>/dev/null | mail -s "Daily Threat Hunt - $(date) - [Your Name]" [email protected] Find processes with no owner (often stealth malware) ps -eo pid,user,comm | awk '$2 == "?" {print "Orphaned process: " $0}' >> ./my_threat_log.txt Generate your own visibility dashboard (no one else will) find /var/log -1ame ".log" -exec sh -c 'echo "=== {} ==="; tail -5 {}' \; > ./daily_status_$(date +%F)_by_YourName.txt
Windows (PowerShell hunters):
Hunt for unusual scheduled tasks (often persistence)
Get-ScheduledTask | Where-Object {$<em>.Author -eq "Unknown" -or $</em>.TaskPath -1otlike "\Microsoft\"} | Export-Csv suspicious_tasks_YourName.csv
Run and email to stakeholders (stop waiting to be asked)
$body = Get-Content suspicious_tasks_YourName.csv -Raw
Send-MailMessage -To "[email protected]" -Subject "ASSERTIVE HUNT: $(Get-Date) - 3 unknown tasks found by $env:USERNAME" -Body $body -SmtpServer internal-smtp
Log your own KPI (hours saved)
Add-Content -Path "$env:USERPROFILE\impact_metrics.txt" -Value "$(Get-Date): Found 3 persistence artifacts - remediation time saved ~6 hours"
Pro tip: Use `–extra` in `rkhunter` and `–quiet` in `clamscan` to suppress noise, but always output to a file with your name in the path.
What Undercode Say:
- Key Takeaway 1: Zero‑trust isn’t just a network model—it’s a career posture. Apply least privilege to access AND to your contributions. Every packet you inspect and every log you parse should carry your signature. Kindness with boundaries equals zero‑trust security for both systems and self‑advancement.
- Key Takeaway 2: “Assertive automation” beats silent competence. A SIEM that pages at 3 AM, a cron job that emails metrics, and PowerShell scripts that timestamp every action create irreversible visibility. The most respected security engineers don’t wait for recognition; they harden their career logs as aggressively as their firewall rules.
Analysis: The LinkedIn post’s eight sabotaging behaviours map directly to cybersecurity failures. Over‑accommodation = over‑permissioning; avoiding hard conversations = delayed vulnerability disclosure; undervaluing work = no logging; not asking = not escalating privileges; putting others first = unconstrained resources; softening messages = polite alerts; giving credit = no forensic attribution; waiting = no proactive hunting. The commands above transform “nice” operations into assertive, auditable, and career‑advancing security postures. Just as kindness without clarity lets others overtake you, permissive configurations let attackers overtake your network. The fix is the same: document, limit, alert, and claim your work.
Prediction:
- -1 Organisations that reward “nice” admins will suffer 47% longer breach detection times (average from 2024 Verizon DBIR) because polite cultures suppress critical alerts and delayed patching. Expect regulatory fines to triple in 2026–2027 for companies where “keeping the peace” overrode security reporting.
- +1 Emerging “Assertive Security Engineering” frameworks (inspired by DevOps ChatOps and blameless post‑mortems) will become standard by 2028. These combine technical hardening with mandatory self‑attribution and weekly impact dashboards, driving promotions for engineers who automate their own visibility. The most successful CISOs in 2027 will be those who replaced “being nice” with “being clear” in both firewall rules and performance reviews.
▶️ Related Video (70% Match):
🎯Let’s Practice For Free:
🎓 Live Courses & Certifications:
Join Undercode Academy for Verified Certifications
🚀 Request a Custom Project:
Secure, high-velocity infrastructure and disruptive technological engineering. Contact our engineering team for high-tier development and proprietary systems:
[email protected]
💎 Smart Architecture | 🛡️ Secure by Design | ⭐ Trusted by Thousands
IT/Security Reporter URL:
Reported By: Doravanourek Being – Hackers Feeds
Extra Hub: Undercode MoN
Basic Verification: Pass ✅
