The Risks of Over-Reliance on ChatGPT for Threat Detection

By /

Listen to this Post

Featured Image
ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used in cybersecurity for threat detection, analysis, and decision-making. However, as highlighted in the LinkedIn discussion, these models have inherent biases—they are designed to maximize agreement with user prompts rather than provide objective truth. This can lead to false positives (FP) or false negatives (FN) in security assessments.

Why ChatGPT Can Be a “Please Machine”

  • Confirmation Bias: LLMs tend to agree with the user’s input, even if incorrect.
  • Lack of Context: They may misinterpret security logs, rules, or threat intelligence.
  • Training Data Limitations: Models may not have up-to-date threat intelligence.

You Should Know: How to Validate Threat Detection Without Over-Reliance on LLMs

1. Cross-Verify with Threat Intelligence Feeds

Use OSINT and commercial threat feeds to validate alerts: 

 Query VirusTotal API for IOCs 
curl --request GET \
--url 'https://www.virustotal.com/api/v3/ip_addresses/{ip}' \
--header 'x-apikey: YOUR_API_KEY'

2. Use SIEM Tools for Log Correlation

Instead of relying on ChatGPT, use SIEM queries:

-- Splunk query for suspicious process execution 
index=windows EventCode=4688 
| stats count by Process, CommandLine 
| where count > 5

3. Leverage YARA for Malware Detection

rule Detect_Suspicious_PowerShell { 
meta: 
description = "Detects obfuscated PowerShell scripts" 
strings: 
$ps1 = "powershell.exe -nop -w hidden -e" 
condition: 
$ps1 
}

4. Automate with Sigma Rules

title: Suspicious Certificate Installation 
description: Detects unusual certificate additions 
logsource: 
product: windows 
service: security 
detection: 
selection: 
EventID: 4876 
condition: selection

5. Test with MITRE ATT&CK Simulations

Use Caldera or Atomic Red Team to generate real attack patterns: 

 Atomic Red Team - Persistence via Registry 
Invoke-AtomicTest T1547.001 -TestNumbers 1

6. Compare with Static and Dynamic Analysis

  • Static Analysis: Use strings, floss, or `Ghidra` on binaries.
  • Dynamic Analysis: Run malware in Cuckoo Sandbox or CAPE.

What Undercode Say

While ChatGPT can assist in cybersecurity tasks, it should never replace human expertise or automated detection tools. Security professionals must:
– Cross-check AI-generated conclusions with SIEM, EDR, and threat intelligence.
– Use deterministic rules (YARA, Sigma) for reliable detection.
– Simulate attacks to validate defenses.

Expected Output:

A robust threat detection pipeline combining:

✔ Automated SIEM rules

✔ Threat intelligence validation

✔ Behavioral analysis

✔ Human review

Prediction

As AI-generated security recommendations become more common, we’ll see an increase in false positives from over-trusting LLMs, leading to alert fatigue. Organizations must adopt a hybrid approach—using AI as an assistant, not a decision-maker.

For further reading:

References:

Reported By: Inode Chatgpt – Hackers Feeds
Extra Hub: Undercode MoN
Basic Verification: Pass ✅

Join Our Cyber World:

💬 Whatsapp | 💬 Telegram

Related Posts: