Listen to this Post

Introduction:
The cybersecurity industry is undergoing a seismic shift. In the span of just two decades, over 200 innovative security startups have been absorbed by 11 dominant giants, a trend accelerating in real-time with recent acquisitions by CrowdStrike, Zscaler, and Check Point. For IT and security professionals, this isn’t just boardroom news; it fundamentally alters the technology landscape, creating complex challenges in tool integration, API management, and identity sprawl. As vendors consolidate, security teams must navigate the technical debt of legacy point products while integrating new, absorbed solutions into their existing stacks to prevent gaps in their defense.
Learning Objectives:
- Understand the technical implications of vendor consolidation on existing security infrastructure.
- Learn how to audit and map current security tools against a consolidated vendor landscape.
- Acquire hands-on skills for integrating acquired technologies via APIs and identity management protocols.
You Should Know:
1. Auditing Your Current Stack for Vendor Overlap
With companies like CrowdStrike absorbing identity tools (SGNL) and browser security (Seraphic), and Zscaler adding data exposure management (SPLX), your current environment likely has overlapping agents. Before any migration, you must perform a technical audit.
Step‑by‑step guide:
- Linux/macOS: Use `lsof -i | grep LISTEN` to identify all listening services that could be security agents. Cross-reference the process names (e.g.,
falcon-sensor,zscaler) with a CSV export of your purchased tools. - Windows (PowerShell): Run `Get-WmiObject -Class Win32_Product | Select-Object Name, Version, Vendor` to list installed software. Pipe this to `Export-Csv -Path inventory.csv` to create a master list.
- Network Mapping: Use `nmap -sV -p-
` against a test segment to identify unmanaged or rogue security tools broadcasting their presence. This reveals “shadow IT” security tools that might be acquired and need rationalization.
2. API Integration: Connecting Disparate Tools Post-Acquisition
When a giant like Check Point acquires a cloud security tool (e.g., Cyata), integration often happens via APIs long before the UI is merged. You need to manually bridge the gap.
Step‑by‑step guide (using cURL and Python):
- Extract Logs via API: Use cURL to pull threat intelligence from the acquired tool’s API.
curl -X GET "https://api.cyata.example.com/v1/threats" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" | jq '.' > threats.json
- Forward to SIEM: Write a simple Python script to parse the JSON and forward high-severity alerts to your primary vendor (e.g., Splunk or CrowdStrike Falcon) using their respective APIs. This ensures the acquisition doesn’t create a visibility blind spot.
import requests, json with open('threats.json') as f: data = json.load(f) for alert in data['alerts']: if alert['severity'] == 'high': payload = {'event': alert, 'sourcetype': 'acquired_tool'} requests.post('https://http-inputs-crowdstrike.splunkcloud.com/services/collector/raw', data=json.dumps(payload), headers={'Authorization': 'Splunk YOUR_TOKEN'})
- Identity Consolidation: Mapping SGNL (PDP) to Your Existing IdP
CrowdStrike’s acquisition of SGNL (a Policy Decision Point) aims to unify identity and endpoint security. To prepare, you must understand how Policy as Code interacts with your Identity Provider (IdP) like Okta or Azure AD.
Step‑by‑step guide:
- Extract Current Policies: Use the Okta API to list all application assignment policies.
curl -X GET "https://YOUR_DOMAIN.okta.com/api/v1/apps?filter=status eq \"ACTIVE\"" \ -H "Accept: application/json" -H "Authorization: SSWS YOUR_OKTA_TOKEN" > okta_apps.json
- Simulate a PDP Decision: Map a user’s access based on device posture. If SGNL is now integrated into Falcon, you can simulate a conditional access block using a Linux `bash` script that checks for a running Falcon process before allowing SSH.
!/bin/bash if pgrep -x "falcon-sensor" > /dev/null; then echo "Falcon running. Access Granted." Proceed with login or API call else echo "Endpoint not compliant. Access Denied." exit 1 fi
4. Hardening the “Glue”: Securing the Acquirer’s Infrastructure
When Zscaler acquires a web security company (SquareX), the initial integration phase can introduce API security flaws. You must harden the data flow between your tenant and the new service.
Step‑by‑step guide:
- TLS Version Audit: Use `nmap –script ssl-enum-ciphers -p 443 zscaler.net` to ensure the new endpoint isn’t allowing weak ciphers.
- Certificate Pinning: For custom agents, extract the public key hash of the new service.
openssl s_client -connect api.squarex.example.com:443 -servername api.squarex.example.com 2>&1 < /dev/null | openssl x509 -pubkey -noout | openssl rsa -pubin -outform der 2>/dev/null | openssl dgst -sha256 -binary | base64
This hash can then be hardcoded into your Zscaler client configuration to prevent MITM attacks during the transition.
- Migrating from Point Solution to Platform (EDR to XDR)
If you are a CrowdStrike customer who also used Seraphic (browser security) before its acquisition, you must migrate configurations to the native Falcon console. This often involves regex and YAML conversions.
Step‑by‑step guide:
- Export Browser Policies: From the legacy Seraphic interface (or its API), export the blocklist/allowlist as a CSV or JSON.
- Convert to Falcon Format: Falcon often uses custom IOCs. Use `sed` in Linux to convert domains to CrowdStrike IOC format.
cat seraphic_blocklist.csv | awk -F ',' '{print $2}' | sed 's/^/domain./' > falcon_ioc_list.txt - Ingest via API: Use Falcon’s API to upload the converted list, ensuring browser isolation rules persist through the acquisition.
6. Linux Command-Line Forensics for Deprecated Agents
As vendors consolidate, older point products are deprecated. Malicious actors often exploit the period between “EoL Announcement” and “Agent Uninstall.” You must hunt for lingering, unmanaged agents.
Step‑by‑step guide:
- Find Orphaned Processes: `ps aux | grep -E “symantec|mcafee|trend”` (look for EoL software).
- Check Kernel Modules: `lsmod | grep -E “hook|driver”` to see if old rootkit-like security drivers are still loaded, creating instability.
- Remove Stale Repos: Check `/etc/apt/sources.list.d/` on Ubuntu/Debian for old vendor repositories that are no longer maintained, removing them to prevent update errors.
grep -lR "oldsecurityvendor" /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ | xargs rm
7. Cloud Configuration Drift During M&A
When a cloud security company is acquired (e.g., Wiz or Orca speculation), CSPM policies often change. Use Terraform to maintain state.
Step‑by‑step guide:
- Terraform Plan: Run `terraform plan -out=tfplan` to capture the current state of your cloud security posture.
- Policy as Code: Use `checkov` (an open-source tool) to scan your Terraform files for deviations from the new, merged security standards of the acquiring company.
checkov -d . --framework terraform --quiet
What Undercode Say:
- Consolidation creates a “Single Point of Stacking” risk: While reducing vendor count, it increases the blast radius. A compromise of one giant (e.g., via an API key) now gives attackers access to identity, endpoint, and email security data. Defenders must treat these consolidated vendors as crown jewels, implementing strict IAM and network segmentation even for internal “security” traffic.
- The API is the new perimeter: The frantic integration of 200+ companies means that for the next 12-24 months, APIs will be the weakest link. Security teams need to move beyond UI-based management and invest heavily in API Security Posture Management (ASPM) to monitor the “plumbing” between the acquired tools and the mothership.
- Innovation doesn’t stop, it just moves: Founders are now building for acquisition by these 11 giants. For practitioners, this means the core technologies (browser isolation, identity threat detection) will survive, but you must be ready to re-learn the interface and re-write your automation scripts every 18 months as features are swallowed by the mothership’s console.
Prediction:
Within the next three years, we will see the emergence of “Mega-Platform” compliance frameworks. Just as PCI DSS governs payment data, new regulations will specifically address the systemic risk of having a single security vendor control the endpoint, identity, and network stack. This will force the 11 giants to open-source their core integration APIs to prove “swappability,” or face antitrust-style breakups mandated by cyber insurance carriers unwilling to insure monocultures.
▶️ Related Video (76% Match):
🎯Let’s Practice For Free:
IT/Security Reporter URL:
Reported By: Rosshaleliuk The – Hackers Feeds
Extra Hub: Undercode MoN
Basic Verification: Pass ✅


