Listen to this Post
Introduction:
In the shadowy world of cyber threat intelligence, connecting the dots between seemingly disparate attacker activities is the difference between spotting a breach and becoming a headline. SOCRadar® Extended Threat Intelligence Threat Research Team has been meticulously tracking the digital breadcrumbs—linking infrastructure, artifacts, and attacker activity across the global threat landscape. Their upcoming full story promises to unveil a massive operation that demonstrates how modern threat hunting transcends individual Indicators of Compromise (IOCs) to reveal the complete adversary infrastructure.
Learning Objectives:
- Master infrastructure chaining techniques to connect attacker-controlled assets across campaigns
- Implement advanced threat hunting methodologies using pivot points and historical DNS analysis
- Deploy automated intelligence workflows to detect and respond to infrastructure-level threats
You Should Know:
- Infrastructure Chaining: The Core of Modern Threat Analysis
Infrastructure chaining uses the relationships between highly connected datasets to build out an investigation. This process is the core of threat infrastructure analysis and allows organizations to surface new connections, group similar attack activity and substantiate assumptions during incident response.
Step‑by‑step guide explaining what this does and how to use it:
Step 1: Establish Your Starting Point. Begin with a single indicator—a malware sample, a suspicious IP, or a domain. For example, if you discover a piece of malware attempting to connect to 185.165.29[.]101, that IP becomes your pivot point.
Step 2: Enrich with TLS/SSL Certificate Data. Extract the TLS certificate from the IP. Use OpenSSL to grab certificate details:
Linux - Extract certificate from IP openssl s_client -connect 185.165.29.101:443 -showcerts </dev/null 2>/dev/null | openssl x509 -text -1oout Extract Subject Alternative Names (SAN) openssl s_client -connect 185.165.29.101:443 -showcerts </dev/null 2>/dev/null | openssl x509 -1oout -ext subjectAltName
Step 3: Pivot to Related Domains. The certificate’s Common Name or SAN field often reveals additional domains under the same control. Query Certificate Transparency logs:
Using crt.sh API to find certificates for a domain curl -s "https://crt.sh/?q=%.example.com&output=json" | jq '.[].name_value' | sort -u
Step 4: Analyze Historical DNS Data. Check if these domains resolved to other IPs historically:
Using dig to check historical DNS (requires securitytrails or similar API) curl -s "https://api.securitytrails.com/v1/domain/example.com/history" -H "APIKEY: YOUR_KEY"
Step 5: Identify Code Reuse and Unique Identifiers. Scan associated pages for unique trackers like NewRelicIDs, Google Analytics IDs, or custom JavaScript variables.
Step 6: Cluster and Document. Group findings under a naming convention for future reference. Store in a structured format:
{
"cluster_id": "APT_IRAN_2025_001",
"ip_addresses": ["185.165.29.101", "206.71.148.78"],
"domains": ["cloud.sophos[.]one", "hopers[.]ru"],
"ssl_hashes": ["abc123..."],
"first_seen": "2025-01-15",
"ttp_mapping": ["T1071", "T1583"]
}
2. Leveraging AI-Powered Threat Intelligence for Automated Detection
SOCRadar’s Agentic Threat Intelligence platform moves cyber threat intelligence from static alerts to automated, AI-driven action. The platform deploys autonomous AI agents that detect, analyze, and respond to external threats, cutting manual workload while keeping analysts in control of final decisions.
Step‑by‑step guide explaining what this does and how to use it:
Step 1: Deploy Autonomous Agents. Configure AI agents specialized for specific threat types—phishing detection, brand abuse, credential leaks, and IP exposure. Each agent operates with a multi-model LLM architecture where one model generates and another validates outputs.
Step 2: Set Validation Thresholds. Every agent output runs through a custom checklist—often created by senior analysts—and must pass at least 90% of criteria before human review.
Step 3: Automate Phishing Detection Workflows. Traditional phishing detection could take an hour: jumping between tools, pasting screenshots, checking WHOIS, and doing manual analysis. With agentic workflows, the entire pipeline finishes in five minutes.
Step 4: Implement Multi-Tenant Orchestration. For MSSPs, assign agents to specific clients, SLAs, or use cases—monitoring CVEs, generating branded monthly reports, correlating dark web findings with client IOCs, or flagging phishing domains across all tenants.
Step 5: Enable Natural Language Querying. Use the SOCRadar MCP Server to enable any AI assistant to function as a cybersecurity analyst, capable of managing complex tasks, conducting threat investigations, and responding to incidents using natural language.
Windows PowerShell Example for Automated IOC Enrichment:
PowerShell - Bulk IOC enrichment with AI context
$iocs = @("185.165.29.101", "cloud.sophos[.]one", "abc123filehash")
foreach ($ioc in $iocs) {
$result = Invoke-RestMethod -Uri "https://api.socradar.com/v1/enrich?ioc=$ioc" -Headers @{"Authorization"="Bearer YOUR_API_KEY"}
Write-Host "IOC: $ioc - MITRE ATT&CK: $($result.techniques) - Campaign: $($result.campaign)"
}
3. Tracking Attack Campaigns Through Infrastructure Reuse
Threat actors frequently reuse networks, tools, and even operational mistakes, making historical records a valuable asset for tracking evolving tactics. By observing infrastructure, researchers can infer connections between malware samples and threat groups.
Step‑by‑step guide explaining what this does and how to use it:
Step 1: Identify Pivot Points. During an investigation, look for overlapping infrastructure. For example, if domain A resolves to IP X and domain B historically resolved to the same IP, both may belong to the same threat actor.
Step 2: Map the Infrastructure. Create an infrastructure diagram showing relationships between IPs, domains, SSL certificates, and malware samples.
Step 3: Apply the Diamond Model. Use the Diamond Model framework to analyze adversaries by examining four key elements: Adversary, Capability, Infrastructure, and Victim.
Step 4: Track TTP Evolution. Document how tactics, techniques, and procedures evolve over time. The 2025 SANS CTI Survey confirms that stealer logs, identity-driven threats, and threat intelligence overload have made early detection and actionable reporting more critical than ever.
Linux Command for Bulk WHOIS and DNS Correlation:
!/bin/bash Bulk domain infrastructure analysis for domain in $(cat domains.txt); do echo "=== $domain ===" whois $domain | grep -E "Registrar|Creation Date|Name Server" dig +short $domain curl -s "https://api.certspotter.com/v1/issuances?domain=$domain&include_subdomains=true" | jq '.[].dns_names' done
4. External Attack Surface Management (EASM) Fundamentals
SOCRadar’s Extended Threat Intelligence (XTI) platform integrates attack surface management with supply chain intelligence, offering enterprises comprehensive threat visibility and actionable insights. The platform combines External Attack Surface Management (EASM), Digital Risk Protection Services (DRPS), Advanced Dark Web Monitoring, Supply Chain Intelligence, and Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI).
Step‑by‑step guide explaining what this does and how to use it:
Step 1: Discover Exposed Assets. Use EASM tools to identify all internet-facing assets, including subdomains, open ports, and cloud instances:
Using Amass for subdomain enumeration amass enum -d target.com -o subdomains.txt Using Nmap for port scanning nmap -sS -sV -p- --open -T4 -oA scan_results target.com
Step 2: Monitor for Misconfigurations. Continuously scan for exposed S3 buckets, open databases, and misconfigured cloud services:
AWS S3 bucket enumeration aws s3 ls s3://target-bucket --1o-sign-request Check for open MongoDB instances nmap -p 27017 --script mongodb-info target.com
Step 3: Track Digital Risk. Monitor dark web sources for potential threats targeting organizations, detecting impersonating domains and tracking social media platforms for brand abuse.
Step 4: Assess Supply Chain Risk. Evaluate the security posture of your entire supply network using third-party risk intelligence.
Windows Command for Asset Discovery:
Windows - DNS enumeration nslookup -type=any target.com for /f %i in (subdomains.txt) do nslookup %i.target.com
5. Identity-Based Threat Detection and Mitigation
Threat actors increasingly exploit identity weaknesses, using stolen credentials to “log in instead of hack in”. SOCRadar provides deep visibility into stealer logs—collections of stolen credentials including emails, passwords, and session cookies that circulate on the dark web long before a breach is detected.
Step‑by‑step guide explaining what this does and how to use it:
Step 1: Monitor Dark Web for Credential Leaks. Deploy dark web monitoring to detect exposed credentials associated with your organization’s domains.
Step 2: Implement Contextual Identity Intelligence. Use behavioral analytics to detect anomalous login patterns—geographic anomalies, impossible travel, and unusual session characteristics.
Step 3: Enforce Zero Trust Authentication. Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) with conditional access policies. Monitor for MFA fatigue attacks and implement number matching.
Step 4: Automate Credential Rotation. When credentials are detected in stealer logs, automatically trigger password resets and session invalidation:
PowerShell - Force password reset for compromised accounts
$compromisedUsers = Get-Content compromised_users.txt
foreach ($user in $compromisedUsers) {
Set-ADAccountPassword -Identity $user -Reset -1ewPassword (ConvertTo-SecureString -String "NewComplexPassword123!" -AsPlainText -Force)
Revoke-ADUserSession -Identity $user
}
Step 5: Investigate Identity-Based Attacks. Use MITRE ATT&CK mapping to understand which techniques were used—T1078 (Valid Accounts), T1110 (Brute Force), or T1556 (Modify Authentication Process).
6. Vulnerability Exploitation and Patching Strategies
The 2025 threat landscape shows a surge in zero-day exploitation. APT organizations targeted critical infrastructure and technology sectors, with telecommunications being the most targeted sector at 70.8%. Recent vulnerabilities include a two-factor authentication bypass in Zyxel ATP/USG devices (CVE-2025-9133) and a Zimbra Collaboration Suite zero-day (CVE-2025-27915).
Step‑by‑step guide explaining what this does and how to use it:
Step 1: Maintain Vulnerability Intelligence. Subscribe to threat intelligence feeds that provide early warning of new vulnerabilities.
Step 2: Prioritize Based on Exploitability. Use AI-powered prioritization that considers real-world exploit activity, not just CVSS scores.
Step 3: Implement Virtual Patching. Deploy Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to mitigate vulnerabilities before patches are available:
Nginx WAF rule for CVE-2025-27915 (Zimbra JavaScript injection)
location ~ .ics$ {
if ($args ~ "ontoggle") {
return 403;
}
}
Step 4: Automate Patching Workflows. Use orchestration tools to deploy patches across your infrastructure:
Linux - Automated patching with ansible ansible-playbook -i inventory.yml patch-playbook.yml --limit "critical_servers" Windows - Using PSWindowsUpdate Install-Module PSWindowsUpdate Get-WUInstall -AcceptAll -AutoReboot
Step 5: Validate Patch Effectiveness. Perform vulnerability scanning after patching to confirm remediation:
Using OpenVAS for vulnerability scanning omp -u admin -w password -G
What Undercode Say:
- Key Takeaway 1: Infrastructure chaining transforms isolated IOCs into actionable intelligence by revealing the interconnected nature of adversary operations. A single IP or domain is never just a point—it’s a thread in a larger tapestry of malicious activity.
-
Key Takeaway 2: AI-powered threat intelligence is not about replacing analysts but augmenting their capabilities. By automating data gathering, pattern recognition, and reporting, security teams can focus on strategic decision-making rather than tactical grunt work. The shift from static alerts to autonomous agentic workflows represents a fundamental evolution in how we approach cyber defense.
Analysis: The SOCRadar Threat Research Team’s upcoming disclosure signals a paradigm shift in threat intelligence—moving beyond reactive IOC sharing to proactive infrastructure mapping. This approach acknowledges that modern adversaries operate sophisticated, layered infrastructures designed to evade point-in-time detection. The integration of AI agents into threat hunting workflows addresses the critical challenge of intelligence overload identified in the 2025 SANS CTI Survey. Organizations that fail to adopt infrastructure-level thinking will remain perpetually reactive, chasing indicators while attackers pivot through their infrastructure. The future of cybersecurity lies not in collecting more data, but in connecting the right data points to reveal the adversary’s complete operational picture.
Prediction:
- +1 Infrastructure chaining will become the de facto standard for threat intelligence by 2027, with major SIEM and XDR platforms embedding graph-based analytics natively.
-
+1 AI agents will handle 70% of tier-1 and tier-2 analyst tasks by 2026, reducing mean time to detect (MTTD) from hours to minutes.
-
-1 As defenders get better at infrastructure tracking, adversaries will accelerate the adoption of ephemeral infrastructure—dynamically generated domains and IPs with lifespans measured in hours—making traditional chaining more challenging.
-
-1 The skills gap in threat infrastructure analysis will widen, creating a premium for professionals who can combine technical expertise with investigative intuition.
-
+1 Integration of threat intelligence with attack surface management will enable predictive defense—identifying and neutralizing adversary infrastructure before it’s used in attacks.
▶️ Related Video (80% Match):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2E1Tn1zhgIQ
🎯Let’s Practice For Free:
🎓 Live Courses & Certifications:
Join Undercode Academy for Verified Certifications
🚀 Request a Custom Project:
Secure, high-velocity infrastructure and disruptive technological engineering. Contact our engineering team for high-tier development and proprietary systems:
[email protected]
💎 Smart Architecture | 🛡️ Secure by Design | ⭐ Trusted by Thousands
IT/Security Reporter URL:
Reported By: Mertsarica Something – Hackers Feeds
Extra Hub: Undercode MoN
Basic Verification: Pass ✅
