Listen to this Post
Introduction:
Rich Communication Services (RCS) was designed to replace SMS with encrypted, feature-rich messaging – but threat actors and even legitimate enterprises are increasingly abusing it to blast spam at scale. When a cybersecurity researcher publicly identified that Jio Platforms Limited (JPL) was leveraging Google RCS to send unsolicited promotional messages to millions, the company’s head of Digital Messaging responded not with technical remediation, but by blocking the researcher and deleting his comment – a glaring operational security (OPSEC) failure that confirms the worst fears about RCS abuse and corporate accountability.
Learning Objectives:
- Analyze how RCS can be weaponized for spam and track message origins using packet inspection.
- Implement OPSEC best practices for corporate social media and vulnerability disclosure handling.
- Apply Linux/Windows commands and API hardening techniques to detect and mitigate RCS-based spam campaigns.
You Should Know:
1. Tracing RCS Spam Headers and Origin Infrastructure
RCS messages travel via the carrier’s IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) and Google’s Jibe cloud. To identify whether a spam RCS is coming from Jio’s platform – or an impersonator – you need to capture and decode SIP traffic.
Step‑by‑step guide (Linux – using Wireshark and tshark):
1. Install dependencies:
`sudo apt update && sudo apt install wireshark-tshark sipcrack`
2. Capture RCS‑related SIP packets on your mobile hotspot interface (e.g., wlan0):
`sudo tshark -i wlan0 -Y “sip” -w rcs_spam.pcap`
3. Extract the `P-Asserted-Identity` and `Origin` headers:
`tshark -r rcs_spam.pcap -Y “sip.Method == ‘MESSAGE'” -T fields -e sip.msg_header`
4. Reverse‑lookup the source IP:
`dig -x`
Windows alternative (using Npcap and PowerShell):
Install Npcap, then run: & 'C:\Program Files\Wireshark\tshark.exe' -i Ethernet -Y "sip" -w rcs_spam.pcap Filter for spam patterns (e.g., containing "Jio" or "offer"): & 'C:\Program Files\Wireshark\tshark.exe' -r rcs_spam.pcap -Y 'sip && text contains "Jio"'
What this does: You can determine if the spam originates from a legitimate RCS aggregator (like Google Jibe) or a rogue SMS‑to‑RCS gateway. In Jio’s case, the headers likely point to their own `rcs.jio.com` domain, proving platform‑endorsed abuse.
- OPSEC for Corporate Social Media – The Blocking Researcher Mistake
Blocking a researcher who found a vulnerability is an OPSEC catastrophe: it signals guilt, destroys transparency, and drives the researcher to publish findings more aggressively. Here’s how to handle disclosure correctly.
Step‑by‑step OPSEC hardening (for social media managers):
- Establish a public vulnerability disclosure policy – include a dedicated email (e.g.,
[email protected]) and a PGP key. - Train comment‑moderation teams to escalate security reports to incident response, not delete/block.
- Use a shadow‑ban detection tool to verify if you’ve been muted – tools like `SocialOPSEC` (open source) check multiple accounts:
`python3 social_opsec.py –check @companyhandle –comment “RCS spam hypothesis”`
- Implement mandatory delay for any block/delete action against a security researcher – review by legal and engineering first.
Windows / cross‑platform script to audit your own blocks:
Audit who you've blocked on LinkedIn (using unofficial API wrapper)
pip install linkedin-scraper
python -c "from linkedin_scraper import Person; p=Person('your_profile_url'); print(p.blocked)"
Why it matters: Blocking a researcher like Akshay after he pointed out RCS spam confirms the spam is intentional and that the company prioritizes reputation over remediation. Proper OPSEC would have turned a liability into a coordinated fix.
- API Security: How Spammers Abuse RCS Platform APIs
Google’s RCS Business Messaging (RBM) API allows verified businesses to send rich messages. Attackers or rogue employees can obtain API credentials and blast millions of messages. Jio, as a Google partner, likely has elevated API quotas.
Testing for API misconfigurations (Linux – using curl and Postman):
Step 1 – Identify the RCS API endpoint (common patterns)
curl -I https://rcs.jio.com/v1/messages
curl -I https://jio.rcsbusiness.com/send
Step 2 – Test rate limiting (send 1000 requests in 1 second)
for i in {1..1000}; do curl -X POST https://rcs.jio.com/api/send -H "Authorization: Bearer FAKE_TOKEN" -d '{"to":"+91XXXXXXXXXX","text":"spam"}' & done
Step 3 – Check for lack of SPF/DKIM on RCS infrastructure
dig txt _dmarc.jio.com
Hardening the RCS API (for defenders):
- Enforce OAuth 2.0 with short-lived tokens (max 1 hour).
- Implement per‑user (MSISDN) daily rate limits: 10 messages per day for promotional, 100 for transactional.
- Use API gateway anomaly detection: `moto` (AWS) or `Kong` – flag bursts of identical content.
Command to monitor for spam bursts in real‑time (using tcpdump + grep):
sudo tcpdump -i any -l -A 'dst port 443' | grep -i -E '(offer|lottery|jio reward)'
- Cloud Hardening for RCS Infrastructure (Google Jibe / Jio)
RCS relays run on cloud environments (GCP, AWS). Misconfigured buckets or pub/sub topics can allow spammers to inject messages.
Step‑by‑step cloud hardening checklist:
- Restrict GCP Pub/Sub topics to only authorized service accounts:
`gcloud pubsub topics add-iam-policy-binding my-rcs-topic –member=’serviceAccount:[email protected]’ –role=’roles/pubsub.publisher’`
- Enable VPC Service Controls to prevent data exfiltration:
`gcloud access-context-manager perimeters create rcs-perimeter –resources=projects/jio-project –restricted-services=pubsub.googleapis.com`
3. Audit unauthenticated RCS message endpoints with `nmap`:
`nmap -p 5060,5061 –script sip-enum-users –script-args sip-enum-users.method=OPTIONS rcs.jio.com`
- Windows: Use Azure CLI for hybrid RCS checks – if Jio also uses Azure:
`az network application-gateway waf-policy list –query “[?contains(name,’rcs’)]”`
How to test if your carrier allows spoofed RCS sender IDs (Linux):
Install sip-cli git clone https://github.com/mehuljain/sip-cli cd sip-cli && make ./sip-cli -u "[email protected]" -c "BUY NOW" -t "+911234567890" -s rcs.jio.com
If the message is delivered, the RCS cloud lacks origin authentication – a critical failing.
- Mitigation Strategy: Block RCS Spam with Firewall Rules and Regex
You don’t need to wait for carriers. You can filter RCS spam at the device or network level.
For Android (using PCAPdroid + iptables on rooted device):
Block all RCS traffic except from known good IPs iptables -A OUTPUT -d 142.250.0.0/15 -j DROP Google Jibe ranges iptables -I OUTPUT -d 203.200.0.0/13 -j ACCEPT Jio legit services - adjust via whois
For Windows / enterprise firewalls (using PowerShell + Windows Filtering Platform):
Block RCS SIP ports 5060/5061 for all outbound except your RCS client exe New-NetFirewallRule -DisplayName "Block RCS Spam" -Direction Outbound -Protocol UDP -LocalPort 5060,5061 -Action Block New-NetFirewallRule -DisplayName "Allow Jio RCS Client" -Direction Outbound -Program "C:\Program Files\JioRCS\jio_rcs.exe" -Action Allow
Step‑by‑step content‑based filtering using Suricata (Linux):
1. Install Suricata: `sudo apt install suricata`
2. Add custom rule to `/etc/suricata/rules/local.rules`:
`alert tcp any any -> any any (msg:”RCS Spam – Promo Keyword”; content:”offer”; content:”Jio”; sid:1000001; rev:1;)`
3. Run Suricata on the RCS interface: `sudo suricata -c /etc/suricata/suricata.yaml -i wlan0`
6. Vulnerability Exploitation (Red Team) – Comment Manipulation & Social Engineering
Blocking a researcher creates a secondary vulnerability: the blocked individual may pivot to more aggressive disclosure (e.g., posting RCS message dumps, SIP traces). As a red teamer, you can simulate this:
Step‑by‑step social engineering of corporate handlers:
- Use `theHarvester` to collect employee emails (LinkedIn + Google dorking):
`theHarvester -d jio.com -b linkedin,google`
- Send a benign but urgent “RCS spam report” to the head of Digital Messaging – monitor response time and whether they block again.
- If blocked, pivot to public pastebin of RCS headers (red team authorized only).
Linux command to search for leaked RCS API keys on GitHub:
curl -s 'https://api.github.com/search/code?q=rcs+jio+key' -H "Authorization: token YOUR_GITHUB_TOKEN" | jq '.items[].html_url'
Mitigation for defenders: Implement a “block‑with‑notification” workflow – when a researcher is blocked, auto‑send a ticket to the CISO for review.
7. Training Courses & Certifications Recommended
Based on this incident, security teams should pursue:
- NIST SP 800-218 – Secure Software Development Framework (for RCS API hardening)
- SIP / VoIP Security (INE’s eCPPT or SANS SEC540) – covers RCS interception.
- Google Cloud Security Engineer – for hardening Jibe/RBM integrations.
- OSINT & OPSEC for Social Media (TCM Security’s Practical OSINT).
Free training command (Linux) to pull RCS security whitepapers:
wget -r -A pdf https://www.gsma.com/security/rcs-interconnection-security/
What Undercode Say:
- Blocking researchers is an attack surface. It confirms vulnerabilities exist and motivates full public disclosure, often including packet captures and API abuse proof.
- RCS spam is worse than SMS spam because it bypasses traditional DND registries and supports rich media, making click‑through rates higher.
- Corporate OPSEC failures like Jio’s provide a case study for cybersecurity training: secure comment handling is not just PR – it’s incident response.
The situation with Akshay and Jio reveals a systemic issue: carriers prioritize RCS monetization over anti‑spam controls. Without mandatory RCS authentication (e.g., STIR/SHAKEN for messaging) and transparent researcher channels, spam will explode. The fact that the head of Digital Messaging blocked rather than engaged proves that technical negligence is paired with hostile disclosure handling.
Prediction:
Within 18 months, a major RCS spam scandal will trigger regulatory action – likely by India’s DoT or EU’s BEREC – forcing Google to enforce per‑carrier spam quotas and public dashboards of spam reports. Meanwhile, cybercriminals will shift from SMS phishing (smishing) to RCS phishing (rcishing), leveraging rich cards and verified sender checkmarks to build trust. Companies like Jio that block researchers today will face class‑action lawsuits tomorrow when leaked internal chats confirm they knew about the abuse but silenced whistleblowers instead of fixing the API. The only winning move is proactive hardening – and public bug bounties for RCS abuse.
▶️ Related Video (76% Match):
🎯Let’s Practice For Free:
IT/Security Reporter URL:
Reported By: Https: – Hackers Feeds
Extra Hub: Undercode MoN
Basic Verification: Pass ✅
