Listen to this Post
Introduction:
As generative AI tools and copilots become embedded into every corner of the enterprise, security teams are facing a new visibility crisis. Employees are using AI to summarize emails, generate code, and analyze data, often without IT’s knowledge, creating a modern “Shadow AI” problem. Microsoft has responded with the Security Dashboard for AI, now in public preview, which consolidates AI activity, posture, and threat signals into a single pane of glass. This article breaks down what the dashboard does, how it integrates with the Microsoft Security stack, and provides the technical commands and configurations needed to start governing AI usage under a Zero Trust framework.
Learning Objectives:
- Understand the architecture and data sources of Microsoft’s new Security Dashboard for AI.
- Learn how to query AI activity logs using KQL (Kusto Query Language) for threat hunting.
- Configure Conditional Access policies to control AI application access based on risk.
- Identify Shadow AI instances using Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps.
- Implement data loss prevention (DLP) policies tailored for AI interactions.
You Should Know:
- Navigating the Security Dashboard for AI (Public Preview)
The dashboard, accessible via the Microsoft Defender Portal, aggregates telemetry from Microsoft 365, Purview, and Defender for Cloud Apps. It visualizes AI application usage, data sensitivity involved in prompts, and user risk levels. To access it, you must have the appropriate roles (Security Reader, Security Admin) and the preview features enabled in your tenant.
Step‑by‑step guide to enabling and accessing the dashboard:
Connect to Exchange Online to ensure audit logging is enabled (required for AI activity capture) Connect-ExchangeOnline Set-AdminAuditLogConfig -UnifiedAuditLogIngestionEnabled $true In the Microsoft 365 Defender portal, navigate to: Settings -> Microsoft 365 Defender -> Preview features Ensure "Preview features" is turned On. Access the dashboard directly via URL after enabling: https://security.microsoft.com/ai-dashboard
- Hunting for AI Prompts and Responses with KQL
The dashboard’s power lies in its underlying data. Security analysts can dive into the `AIActivity` table in Advanced Hunting to investigate specific prompts, associated data sensitivity labels, and user contexts.
Step‑by‑step guide to querying AI interactions:
// Example KQL query to find risky AI interactions involving sensitive data
AIActivity
| where Timestamp > ago(7d)
| where SensitivityLabel in ("Confidential", "Highly Confidential")
| where ActionType == "AIPrompt"
| project Timestamp, UserId, ApplicationName, PromptText, SensitivityLabel, RiskLevel
| top 10 by Timestamp desc
This query helps identify if sensitive data is being pasted into public AI tools, allowing for rapid incident response.
3. Controlling AI Access with Conditional Access
Visibility is useless without control. Using the new “AI applications” filter in Azure AD Conditional Access, administrators can enforce policies such as blocking access to unsanctioned AI apps or requiring device compliance when accessing corporate AI tools like Microsoft Copilot.
Step‑by‑step guide to creating an AI-specific Conditional Access policy (using Microsoft Graph PowerShell):
Install the Microsoft Graph module if not already installed
Install-Module Microsoft.Graph -Scope CurrentUser
Connect to Graph with the necessary scopes
Connect-MgGraph -Scopes "Policy.ReadWrite.ConditionalAccess", "Application.Read.All"
Create a new Conditional Access policy targeting all AI apps
$params = @{
displayName = "Block Unmanaged AI Apps"
state = "enabled"
conditions = @{
applications = @{
includeApplications = @(
"All"
)
applicationFilter = @{
mode = "include"
rule = "app.displayName contains 'AI' or app.tags/any(t:t eq 'AIApp')"
}
}
clientAppTypes = @(
"browser"
"mobileAppsAndDesktopClients"
)
users = @{
includeUsers = @(
"All"
)
}
}
grantControls = @{
operator = "AND"
builtInControls = @(
"block"
)
}
}
New-MgIdentityConditionalAccessPolicy -BodyParameter $params
Note: This uses a conceptual filter; the exact `applicationFilter` syntax may evolve as the feature reaches General Availability.
- Discovering Shadow AI with Defender for Cloud Apps
The dashboard integrates with Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps (formerly MCAS) to identify unsanctioned AI tools being used across the organization. By analyzing traffic logs, it discovers new applications and categorizes them as “AI” based on behavioral analysis.
Step‑by‑step guide to sanctioning or blocking AI apps via Cloud Discovery:
While this is primarily a GUI function, the logs are gathered via: 1. Deploy log collectors on your network (on-prem) or use the native integration with Zscaler, Palo Alto, etc. 2. In the Defender portal, go to Cloud Apps -> Cloud Discovery -> Dashboard. 3. Filter by "Category: AI" to see unsanctioned apps. 4. Select an app and choose "Sanction" or "Block" (blocking is enforced via the reverse proxy or integration with your firewall).
For Linux-based forwarders, logs are typically sent via Syslog to the collector. Example rsyslog configuration to forward firewall logs:
In /etc/rsyslog.conf, add: . @<Your-MCAS-Collector-IP>:<Port>
5. Implementing DLP for AI Interactions
To prevent data leakage, sensitive information must not be allowed in AI prompts. Microsoft Purview’s DLP policies can now be extended to cover AI interactions, scanning prompts for credit card numbers, PII, or custom sensitive info types.
Step‑by‑step guide to creating a DLP policy for Microsoft Copilot (via PowerShell):
Connect to Security & Compliance Center
Connect-IPPSSession
Create a new DLP policy rule targeting AI activities
New-DLPComplianceRule -Name "Block Credit Cards in AI Prompts" -Policy "AI DLP Policy" -ContentContainsSensitiveInformation @{operator="Exists"; groups= @{operator="All"; name="Credit Card Number"; minCount="1"}} -BlockAccess $true -BlockAccessScope "PerUser"
This command ensures that if a user tries to paste a credit card number into an approved AI tool like Copilot, the action is blocked and an alert is generated.
- Hardening the AI Environment with Zero Trust Principles
The dashboard provides posture assessments, but actual hardening requires manual intervention. This includes ensuring that AI applications use managed identities, limiting permissions via RBAC, and enabling audit logging at the infrastructure level for AI workloads (e.g., Azure OpenAI).
Step‑by‑step guide to auditing Azure OpenAI logs:
Using Azure CLI to enable diagnostic settings for Azure OpenAI
az monitor diagnostic-settings create \
--resource <OpenAI-Resource-ID> \
--name "audit-logs-to-sentinel" \
--logs '[{"category": "Audit", "enabled": true}]' \
--workspace <Log-Analytics-Workspace-ID>
This forwards all requests to the Azure OpenAI service to a Log Analytics workspace, where they can be correlated with the Security Dashboard data.
7. Responding to AI-Driven Threats
The dashboard correlates AI activity with identity and threat signals. For instance, if a user with stolen credentials starts generating mass content via an AI tool, it triggers an incident. Automated response playbooks can be created using Microsoft Sentinel.
Step‑by‑step guide to creating a Sentinel automation rule:
// First, create an analytics rule using the following KQL to detect anomalous AI usage AIActivity | where Timestamp > ago(1h) | summarize PromptCount = count(), UniqueApps = dcount(ApplicationName) by UserId, IPAddress | where PromptCount > 50 or UniqueApps > 5 | join kind=inner (IdentityLogonEvents | where Timestamp > ago(1h) | where IsAnonymousProxy == true) on IPAddress
Then, configure an automation rule in Sentinel to trigger a playbook that disables the user account in Azure AD.
What Undercode Say:
- Key Takeaway 1: The Security Dashboard for AI is not just a monitoring tool; it is the linchpin for enforcing Responsible AI and Zero Trust principles in the modern enterprise. It bridges the gap between AI adoption and security governance by providing the visibility required to control the unmanageable.
- Key Takeaway 2: Effective AI security requires a multi-layered approach. The dashboard provides the “see” component, but it must be paired with proactive controls like Conditional Access (the “stop” component) and DLP (the “check” component) to be effective. Commands and policies must be embedded into CI/CD pipelines for infrastructure as code (IaC) to ensure AI workloads are secure by design.
The introduction of this dashboard signals a maturation of the cybersecurity landscape, acknowledging that AI is now a primary vector for data exfiltration and compliance risk. Organizations that fail to implement these controls risk not only data breaches but also regulatory fines as governing bodies increasingly focus on AI transparency and safety.
Prediction:
Within the next 12 to 18 months, we will see the rise of “AI Security Posture Management” (AI-SPM) as a distinct market category, similar to how CSPM evolved for cloud. Microsoft’s dashboard is the first step toward this specialization. As AI agents become capable of acting autonomously on behalf of users, the security industry will shift from monitoring human-to-AI interactions to monitoring AI-to-AI and AI-to-system interactions. This will demand a new generation of detection rules and automated response mechanisms, likely leading to the integration of AI firewalls and real-time prompt inspection engines directly into the SIEM stack.
▶️ Related Video (80% Match):
🎯Let’s Practice For Free:
IT/Security Reporter URL:
Reported By: Paul F – Hackers Feeds
Extra Hub: Undercode MoN
Basic Verification: Pass ✅
