Listen to this Post
When a critical vulnerability (P1) is reported but flagged as a duplicate, it can be frustrating. However, proper handling ensures efficient resolution and reinforces collaboration in bug bounty programs.
You Should Know:
1. Verify the Duplicate Claim
Before disputing, confirm if the bug is truly a duplicate:
– Check the original report (if accessible).
– Reproduce the issue to ensure it matches the prior submission.
Use curl to verify HTTP-based vulnerabilities curl -X POST -d "payload=test" http://target.com/vulnerable-endpoint
2. Document Differences
If your finding has unique aspects:
- Compare CVSS scores (if severity differs).
- Note exploitation vectors (e.g., different input methods).
3. Escalate Professionally
- Politely request reevaluation with technical evidence:
Subject: Re: P1 Duplicate - Additional Impact Body: Hi Team, While this resembles Bug-ID123, my submission demonstrates RCE via alternate parameters (see attached PoC).
4. Automate Bug Tracking
- Use scripts to track submissions:
import requests API_KEY = "your_api_key" response = requests.get(f"https://api.bugbounty.com/reports?key={API_KEY}") print(response.json())
5. Prevent Future Duplicates
- Search existing reports before submission:
grep -r "login_flaw" ./bug_reports/
What Undercode Say:
Handling duplicates is part of the ethical hacking process. Always:
– Prioritize clarity in reports.
– Leverage automation (e.g., `jq` for JSON parsing):
curl -s https://api.target.com/issues | jq '.reports[] | select(.status == "open")'
– Contribute to triage by linking related bugs.
Prediction:
Bug bounty platforms will soon integrate AI-driven duplicate detection, reducing manual reviews.
Expected Output:
A structured, evidence-based rebuttal or acceptance of the duplicate status, improving platform efficiency.
URLs (if applicable):
References:
Reported By: Ajay Naik – Hackers Feeds
Extra Hub: Undercode MoN
Basic Verification: Pass ✅
