The Importance of Transparent Detection Logic in Intrusion Detection Systems

Listen to this Post

Featured Image
Intrusion detection tools that fail to expose their detection logic with alerts indicate a misalignment between product management and SOC goals. Analysts need visibility into detection signatures to investigate alerts effectively. Vendors often treat detection signatures as proprietary differentiators, but the real value lies in their ability to create and maintain high-quality signatures efficiently.

You Should Know: Practical Steps for SOC Analysts

1. Extracting Detection Logic from IDS/IPS

Many commercial tools hide detection rules, but open-source solutions like Snort and Suricata provide full transparency.

Viewing Suricata Rules

cat /etc/suricata/rules/.rules 

Testing a Custom Snort Rule

snort -c /etc/snort/snort.conf -A console -q -l /var/log/snort -i eth0 

2. Analyzing Alerts with Full Context

Use Zeek (formerly Bro) to enrich alerts with network metadata:

zeek -C -r suspicious_traffic.pcap 

Check logs in:

cat conn.log | jq '. | select(.id.orig_h=="192.168.1.100")' 

3. Reverse-Engineering Opaque Alerts

If a vendor doesn’t provide detection logic:

  • Packet Capture Analysis
    tcpdump -i eth0 -w alert_traffic.pcap 
    
  • YARA for Memory Forensics
    rule suspicious_process { 
    strings: 
    $malicious_string = "cmd.exe /c powershell" 
    condition: 
    $malicious_string 
    } 
    

4. Building Custom Detections

Use Sigma Rules (generic signature format) to detect threats:

title: Suspicious PowerShell Execution 
description: Detects PowerShell with hidden window 
logsource: 
product: windows 
service: sysmon 
detection: 
selection: 
EventID: 1 
CommandLine: " -WindowStyle Hidden " 
condition: selection 

5. Automating Alert Triage with Python

import pandas as pd 
from elasticsearch import Elasticsearch

es = Elasticsearch(['http://localhost:9200']) 
alerts = es.search(index="suricata-alerts", query={"match_all": {}})

df = pd.DataFrame([hit['_source'] for hit in alerts['hits']['hits']]) 
print(df[['src_ip', 'alert.signature', 'payload']].head()) 

What Undercode Say

Transparency in detection logic is non-negotiable for effective SOC operations. Analysts must demand:
– Full rule visibility (like Snort/Suricata)
– Context-rich alerts (Zeek logs, packet captures)
– Custom detection capabilities (Sigma, YARA)

Vendors prioritizing secrecy over analyst efficiency will lose trust. Open-source tools and scripting (Python, Bash) bridge gaps when commercial solutions fall short.

Prediction

As AI-driven detection grows, vendors may further obscure logic under “proprietary algorithms.” SOC teams must push back, adopting hybrid approaches—leveraging AI alongside transparent, customizable rules.

Expected Output:

  • Suricata/Snort rules for signature transparency
  • Zeek logs for contextual analysis
  • Sigma/YARA for custom detections
  • Python/Elasticsearch for automated triage

Relevant URLs:

IT/Security Reporter URL:

Reported By: Chrissanders88 Threatintel – Hackers Feeds
Extra Hub: Undercode MoN
Basic Verification: Pass ✅

Join Our Cyber World:

💬 Whatsapp | 💬 Telegram