Optimizing Code Reviews with Stacked Pull Requests

Featured Image
Code reviews are essential for maintaining code quality, but they can become bottlenecks if not managed efficiently. One effective solution is stacking pull requests—opening multiple small PRs, each building on the previous one. This approach ensures:

✅ Early and frequent feedback – Catch issues before they escalate.
✅ Simplified reviews – Smaller changes are easier to digest.
✅ No synchronization overhead – Unlike pair programming, reviewers can engage asynchronously.

Learn more about this workflow: Stacking Pull Requests Guide

You Should Know: Practical Git Commands for Stacked PRs

To implement stacked PRs effectively, use these Git commands:

1. Create a Feature Branch

git checkout -b feature/new-login 

2. Commit Small Changes

git add . 
git commit -m "Add login form UI" 

3. Push and Open a PR

git push origin feature/new-login 

(Open a PR for this small change.)

4. Stack Another PR on Top

git checkout feature/new-login 
git checkout -b feature/login-validation 

(Make new changes, commit, and push.)

5. Rebase to Keep History Clean

git rebase -i main 

(Squash or reorder commits if needed.)

6. Resolve Conflicts

git fetch origin 
git merge origin/main 

(Fix conflicts before pushing updates.)

7. Force Push (If Rebasing)

git push origin feature/login-validation --force 

What Undercode Say

Stacked PRs optimize agile workflows, but they require discipline:
– Avoid gigantic PRs – Break them into logical units.
– Use `git diff` to inspect changes before review:

git diff main..feature/login-validation 

– Automate checks with CI/CD:

 Sample GitHub Actions workflow 
name: PR Check 
on: [bash] 
jobs: 
test: 
runs-on: ubuntu-latest 
steps: 
- uses: actions/checkout@v4 
- run: npm test 

For Windows developers, PowerShell equivalents:

git checkout main 
git pull 
git branch -d old-feature  Delete merged branches 

Prediction

As AI-assisted code reviews (e.g., GitHub Copilot) rise, stacked PRs will integrate automated feedback, reducing manual review time. Expect merge conflict resolvers powered by LLMs in Git platforms.

Expected Output:

A streamlined code review process with faster iterations, cleaner Git history, and reduced reviewer fatigue.

(End of )

References:

Reported By: Petarivanovv9 Codereviews – Hackers Feeds
Extra Hub: Undercode MoN
Basic Verification: Pass ✅

Join Our Cyber World:

💬 Whatsapp | 💬 Telegram