Listen to this Post
When selecting a penetration testing (pentest) vendor, their sample report is a critical indicator of their expertise. A poorly constructed report—or the absence of one—suggests incompetence and raises serious red flags. Below are key signs of an unreliable pentest vendor and steps to verify their credibility.
You Should Know:
1. Analyzing Sample Reports
A professional pentest report should include:
- Executive Summary – High-level findings and risk ratings.
- Methodology – Tools and techniques used (e.g., Nmap, Burp Suite, Metasploit).
- Detailed Findings – Vulnerabilities (CVEs), exploitation steps, and remediation advice.
- Proof of Concept (PoC) – Verified attack vectors with screenshots or logs.
Command to Verify Vendor Tools (Linux):
Check if vendor uses industry-standard tools
tools=("nmap" "burpsuite" "metasploit" "sqlmap" "wireshark")
for tool in "${tools[@]}"; do
which $tool || echo "[!] $tool not found";
done
2. Detecting Low-Quality Reports
Signs of an amateur report:
- Lack of CVSS Scores – No Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) ratings.
- Generic Recommendations – Vague fixes like “update software” without specifics.
- No Raw Data – Missing Nessus/OpenVAS scans, Nmap logs, or Metasploit outputs.
Example Nmap Scan for Verification:
nmap -sV --script vuln -oA pentest_scan <target_IP>
3. Validating Vendor Expertise
- Ask for Certifications (OSCP, CEH, CISSP).
- Request References – Past client testimonials.
- Check Public Tools/Research – GitHub repos, whitepapers, or conference talks.
Command to Check Vendor’s Public Contributions (Linux):
curl -s https://api.github.com/users/<vendor_name>/repos | grep -E 'name|description'
4. Red Flags in Engagement
- No Legal Agreement – Missing NDA or Rules of Engagement (RoE).
- Overpromising – “100% breach prevention” claims are unrealistic.
- Black-Box Only – Avoid vendors refusing gray/white-box testing.
Windows Command to Verify Testing Scope:
Check if vendor provides clear scope documents Get-ChildItem -Path .\ -Include .pdf,.docx | Select-String -Pattern "scope|RoE"
What Undercode Say:
Choosing a pentest vendor requires due diligence. A weak report indicates weak skills—always demand samples, verify tools, and cross-check certifications. Ethical hacking thrives on transparency; if a vendor hides incompetence behind jargon, walk away.
Expected Output:
- A well-structured pentest report with CVSS, PoCs, and remediation steps.
- Verified vendor tools and public contributions.
- Clear engagement terms and testing scope.
Prediction:
As pentesting demand grows, low-quality vendors will flood the market. Automated tools like AI-driven pentest platforms may disrupt traditional services, but human expertise remains irreplaceable for critical assessments.
(No URLs extracted; article based on LinkedIn post analysis.)
References:
Reported By: Spenceralessi Pentest – Hackers Feeds
Extra Hub: Undercode MoN
Basic Verification: Pass ✅
