How Hack: The Psychology Behind PR Approvals in Software Engineering

By /

Listen to this Post

Featured Image
(Relevant article based on post: The Hidden Dynamics of Code Reviews in Tech Teams)

You Should Know:

Code reviews and PR (Pull Request) approvals are critical in software engineering, but they often become a playground for psychological and procedural quirks. Below are some practical commands, code snippets, and steps to streamline PR approvals and avoid common pitfalls.

1. Automating PR Checks with GitHub Actions

To ensure PRs meet basic standards before human review, use this GitHub Actions workflow (.github/workflows/pr-checks.yml):

name: PR Checks 
on: [bash] 
jobs: 
lint: 
runs-on: ubuntu-latest 
steps: 
- uses: actions/checkout@v4 
- name: Run Linter 
run: npm run lint  Replace with your project’s lint command 
test: 
runs-on: ubuntu-latest 
steps: 
- uses: actions/checkout@v4 
- name: Run Tests 
run: npm test  Replace with your test command

2. Enforcing Branch Protection

Prevent direct pushes to `main`/`master` and require approvals:

 GitHub CLI command to enforce branch protection 
gh api -X PUT repos/{owner}/{repo}/branches/main/protection \ 
-H "Accept: application/vnd.github.v3+json" \ 
-F "required_pull_request_reviews=1" \ 
-F "enforce_admins=true" \ 
-F "required_status_checks=strict"

3. Detecting Fake Approvals (Pentester’s Trick)

For security audits, check suspicious PR approvals:

 List PR approvals for a repo (GitHub API) 
curl -s -H "Authorization: token YOUR_TOKEN" \ 
"https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews" | jq '.[] | select(.state == "APPROVED") | .user.login'

4. Linux/Windows Commands for PR Hygiene

  • List recent PRs (Git):
    git log --merges --pretty=format:"%h - %an, %ar : %s"
  • Revert a Bad Merge (Git):
    git revert -m 1 <merge-commit-hash>
  • Windows (PowerShell): Check PR Activity
    Invoke-RestMethod -Uri "https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls" | Select-Object title, user.login

Prediction:

As remote work grows, PR approval bots and AI-based code reviewers (like GitHub Copilot) will reduce human bias but may introduce new attack vectors (e.g., adversarial PRs). Expect stricter branch protections and multi-party approval requirements in 2025.

What Undercode Say:

The meme culture around PR approvals reflects deeper workflow inefficiencies. Automate checks, enforce policies, and audit logs to prevent “self-approvals” or rushed merges. Tools like jq, GitHub CLI, and branch locks are your allies.

Expected Output:

  • Automated PR checks.
  • Secure branch protections.
  • Revert strategies for bad merges.
  • Commands to audit PR history.

(No URLs extracted—original post lacked technical content.)

IT/Security Reporter URL:

Reported By: Stuart Todd – Hackers Feeds
Extra Hub: Undercode MoN
Basic Verification: Pass ✅

Join Our Cyber World:

💬 Whatsapp | 💬 Telegram

Related Posts: